DFAT vs. EPSV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFAT (Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF) and EPSV (Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFAT returned 30.02% vs 46.19% for EPSV. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPSV.

Performance

DFAT vs. EPSV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAT achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than EPSV's 26.42% return.

DFAT

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 30.02%
• 3Y*: 16.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EPSV

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 7.26%
• YTD: 26.42%
• 6M: 26.98%
• 1Y: 46.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAT vs. EPSV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF	13.26%	19.38%
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	26.42%	20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAT and EPSV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025	0.91

The correlation between DFAT and EPSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAT vs. EPSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAT	EPSV
Financial Services	28.0%	19.1%
Industrials	15.9%	24.9%
Consumer Cyclical	14.4%	5.8%
Energy	11.5%	6.1%
Technology	9.2%	22.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	5.0%
Healthcare	6.2%	0.9%
Basic Materials	5.1%	4.3%
Communication Services	1.8%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	7.5%
Utilities	0.4%	3.7%

Return for Risk

DFAT vs. EPSV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAT

DFAT Risk / Return Rank: 55
DFAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
DFAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
DFAT Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DFAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DFAT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

EPSV

EPSV Risk / Return Rank: 83
EPSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EPSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
EPSV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EPSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EPSV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAT vs. EPSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAT	EPSV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.62	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.68	-1.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.46	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	5.19	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.13	18.03	-7.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAT vs. EPSV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the EPSV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAT and EPSV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAT	EPSV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81	2.62	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	2.66	-2.21

Drawdowns

DFAT vs. EPSV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, which is greater than EPSV's maximum drawdown of -8.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and EPSV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAT	EPSV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.12%	-8.93%	-17.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-8.93%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	-0.04%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-1.67%	-4.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.57%	+0.40%

Volatility

DFAT vs. EPSV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) is 4.06%, while Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF (EPSV) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that DFAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAT	EPSV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	6.05%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.88%	12.80%	-1.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.75%	17.75%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.48%	18.14%	+3.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.48%	18.14%	+3.34%

DFAT vs. EPSV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than EPSV's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAT vs. EPSV - Dividend Comparison

DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than EPSV's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF	1.45%	1.55%	1.31%	1.34%	1.34%	1.13%
EPSV Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF	2.28%	2.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAT and EPSV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DFAT and EPSV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFAT or EPSV?

EPSV has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to DFAT (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAT dropped -26.12% vs EPSV's -8.93%.

Which ETF is better, DFAT or EPSV?

On 1-year performance, EPSV leads with 46.19% vs 30.02% for DFAT. On fees, DFAT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DFAT has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAT or EPSV?

Over the 1-year period, EPSV has performed better with a 46.19% return vs 30.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAT or EPSV?

DFAT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPSV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAT or EPSV?

EPSV has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.45% for DFAT.

What is the main difference between DFAT and EPSV?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DFAT and 0.88% for EPSV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.