DFAT vs. AVALX
DFAT (Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF) and AVALX (Aegis Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, DFAT returned 16.49%/yr vs 34.33%/yr for AVALX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAT charges 0.28%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for AVALX.
Performance
DFAT vs. AVALX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAT achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than AVALX's 21.92% return.
DFAT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- 1Y
- 30.02%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVALX
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 24.36%
- 1Y
- 58.85%
- 3Y*
- 34.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 20.56%
DFAT vs. AVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 13.26% | 8.73% | 7.80% | 20.86% | -6.23% | 5.08% |
AVALX Aegis Value Fund | 21.92% | 67.06% | 8.29% | 13.11% | 10.50% | -2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAT and AVALX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between DFAT and AVALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAT vs. AVALX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAT
AVALX
DFAT vs. AVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAT | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.62 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 7.34 | -4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 25.89 | -15.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAT | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 3.66 | -1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.54 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
DFAT vs. AVALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAT drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum AVALX drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAT and AVALX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAT | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -73.72% | +47.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.55% | -8.32% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -13.59% | -12.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.64% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -10.95% | +4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.35% | +0.62% |
Volatility
DFAT vs. AVALX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF (DFAT) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Aegis Value Fund (AVALX) at 3.09%. This indicates that DFAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAT | AVALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.09% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.88% | 12.61% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 16.77% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 22.22% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 22.17% | -0.69% |
DFAT vs. AVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than AVALX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAT vs. AVALX - Dividend Comparison
DFAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than AVALX's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVALX Aegis Value Fund | 1.92% | 2.34% | 7.07% | 2.23% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 6.62% | 2.36% | 6.18% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 0.04% |
DFAT Dimensional U.S. Targeted Value ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.31% | 1.34% | 1.34% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAT and AVALX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAT has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to AVALX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAT dropped -26.12% vs AVALX's -73.72%.
AVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAT and AVALX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer