DFAS vs. OILK
DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. DFAS is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAS returned 15.22%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFAS charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
DFAS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 12.81% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAS and OILK is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.15 |
The correlation between DFAS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFAS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAS
OILK
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DFAS
OILK
-
Industrials
DFAS
OILK
-
Technology
DFAS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
DFAS
OILK
Healthcare
DFAS
OILK
-
Energy
DFAS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
DFAS
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
DFAS
OILK
-
Utilities
DFAS
OILK
-
Communication Services
DFAS
OILK
-
Real Estate
DFAS
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
DFAS
OILK
DFAS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.42 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.17 | 6.91 | +3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.06 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.12 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
DFAS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -83.76% | +57.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -17.35% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | -23.42% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -3.66% | +2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -32.61% | +24.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 8.56% | -5.83% |
Volatility
DFAS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 4.31%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 10.44% | -6.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 23.26% | -11.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 28.75% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 30.12% | -9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 35.97% | -15.13% |
DFAS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAS and OILK have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to DFAS (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, OILK leads with 19.03% vs 15.22% for DFAS. On fees, DFAS is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, OILK has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAS is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.
DFAS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for DFAS and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer