DFAS vs. FNDE
DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) and FNDE (Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while FNDE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). DFAS is actively managed, while FNDE is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAS returned 8.05%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for FNDE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAS charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FNDE.
Performance
DFAS vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFAS having a 15.89% return and FNDE slightly lower at 15.28%.
DFAS
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- 1Y
- 32.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- —
FNDE
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
DFAS vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 15.89% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.52% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 15.28% | 29.46% | 12.10% | 14.99% | -15.58% | -2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAS and FNDE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between DFAS and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAS vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAS
FNDE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFAS
FNDE
Industrials
DFAS
FNDE
Technology
DFAS
FNDE
Consumer Cyclical
DFAS
FNDE
Healthcare
DFAS
FNDE
Energy
DFAS
FNDE
Basic Materials
DFAS
FNDE
Consumer Defensive
DFAS
FNDE
Utilities
DFAS
FNDE
Communication Services
DFAS
FNDE
Real Estate
DFAS
FNDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAS vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank
DFAS
FNDE
DFAS vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAS | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 3.26 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 11.87 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAS vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, smaller than the maximum FNDE drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and FNDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAS | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -43.55% | +17.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -10.23% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.13% | -18.40% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.13% | -29.44% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.84% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -11.69% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.80% | -0.08% |
Volatility
DFAS vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) is 5.17%, while Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that DFAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAS | FNDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 6.44% | -1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.88% | 13.13% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 15.64% | +1.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 17.03% | +3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 19.31% | +1.53% |
DFAS vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAS vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison
DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than FNDE's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.90% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 3.63% | 4.19% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 2.98% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAS and FNDE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDE has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to DFAS (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs FNDE's -43.55%.
On 5-year performance, FNDE leads with 9.90% vs 8.05% for DFAS. On fees, DFAS is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 9.90% return vs 8.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAS is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.90% for DFAS.
DFAS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for DFAS and 0.39% for FNDE.
FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAS and FNDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer