PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAS vs. DISV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAS vs. DISV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than DISV's 10.83% return.


DFAS

1D
-0.81%
1M
2.19%
YTD
12.81%
6M
12.10%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
10Y*

DISV

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.34%
YTD
10.83%
6M
15.28%
1Y
34.34%
3Y*
24.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAS vs. DISV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
12.81%8.17%10.21%17.83%-8.74%
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
10.83%47.42%5.87%19.52%-9.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAS and DISV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.71

The correlation between DFAS and DISV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAS vs. DISV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAS
DISV

Financial Services

19.5%
18.6%

Industrials

18.6%
18.1%

Technology

15.0%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.9%
15.3%

Healthcare

11.0%
3.0%

Energy

6.7%
9.2%

Basic Materials

5.6%
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.3%

Utilities

3.8%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.4%

Real Estate

0.2%
3.2%

Financial Services

DFAS
19.5%
DISV
18.6%

Industrials

DFAS
18.6%
DISV
18.1%

Technology

DFAS
15.0%
DISV
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAS
11.9%
DISV
15.3%

Healthcare

DFAS
11.0%
DISV
3.0%

Energy

DFAS
6.7%
DISV
9.2%

Basic Materials

DFAS
5.6%
DISV
18.3%

Consumer Defensive

DFAS
4.3%
DISV
4.3%

Utilities

DFAS
3.8%
DISV
2.6%

Communication Services

DFAS
2.8%
DISV
3.4%

Real Estate

DFAS
0.2%
DISV
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAS vs. DISV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

DISV
DISV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAS vs. DISV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFASDISVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

2.72

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

10.27

-0.10

DFAS vs. DISV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the DISV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAS and DISV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFASDISVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.39

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.93

-0.57

Drawdowns

DFAS vs. DISV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAS drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, roughly equal to the maximum DISV drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAS and DISV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFASDISVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.13%

-26.77%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-12.69%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

-14.15%

-11.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-2.48%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.31%

-4.90%

-3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.73%

3.35%

-0.62%

Volatility

DFAS vs. DISV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) and Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) have volatilities of 4.31% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFASDISVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

4.16%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.58%

11.69%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

14.45%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.84%

17.36%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.84%

17.36%

+3.48%

DFAS vs. DISV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAS has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than DISV's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAS vs. DISV - Dividend Comparison

DFAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than DISV's 2.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.92%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
2.39%2.69%2.77%2.73%1.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAS and DISV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAS has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to DISV (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAS dropped -26.13% vs DISV's -26.77%.

On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 24.35% vs 15.22% for DFAS. On fees, DFAS is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, DISV has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 24.35% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAS is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.

DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.

DFAS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DISV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for DFAS and 0.42% for DISV.

DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAS and DISV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer