PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISV vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISV vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISV achieves a 13.10% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 15.19% return.


DISV

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.88%
6M
6.01%
YTD
13.10%
1Y
32.14%
3Y*
22.91%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.06%

VB

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.73%
6M
10.09%
YTD
15.19%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
11.08%
ALL TIME*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$15.18M$14.28M$13.10M
$121.48M$119.40M$165.11M

DISV vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
13.10%47.42%5.87%19.52%-9.36%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
15.19%8.87%14.17%18.22%-11.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DISV and VB is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022

0.71

The correlation between DISV and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DISV vs. VB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DISV
VB

Financial Services

22.2%
12.4%

Basic Materials

21.8%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

16.2%
11.6%

Industrials

15.2%
19.9%

Healthcare

5.5%
12.5%

Technology

4.4%
17.9%

Energy

4.2%
3.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.5%
7.9%

Utilities

0.8%
3.3%

Financial Services

DISV
22.2%
VB
12.4%

Basic Materials

DISV
21.8%
VB
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DISV
16.2%
VB
11.6%

Industrials

DISV
15.2%
VB
19.9%

Healthcare

DISV
5.5%
VB
12.5%

Technology

DISV
4.4%
VB
17.9%

Energy

DISV
4.2%
VB
3.9%

Communication Services

DISV
4.1%
VB
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

DISV
3.2%
VB
3.3%

Real Estate

DISV
2.5%
VB
7.9%

Utilities

DISV
0.8%
VB
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISV vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DISV
DISV Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DISV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DISV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DISV vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DISVVBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

2.67

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.98

9.73

-0.76

DISV vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISV Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISV and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DISV vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISV drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISV and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISVVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-59.56%

+32.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.69%

-8.98%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.15%

-25.36%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-2.63%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-8.39%

+3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.46%

+1.14%

Volatility

DISV vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF (DISV) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.36%. This indicates that DISV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISVVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.36%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

12.01%

+0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.92%

16.47%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

20.69%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

21.37%

-4.09%

DISV vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISV has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISV vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

DISV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than VB's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISV
Dimensional International Small Cap Value ETF
2.44%2.69%2.77%2.73%1.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.22%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISV and VB have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DISV has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISV dropped -26.77% vs VB's -59.56%.

On 3-year performance, DISV leads with 22.91% vs 14.02% for VB. On fees, VB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VB has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DISV has performed better with a 22.91% return vs 14.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for DISV.

DISV has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 1.22% for VB.

DISV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VB is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for DISV and 0.03% for VB.

DISV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISV and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer