DFAR vs. XLRI
DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAR is a REIT fund actively managed by Dimensional, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
DFAR vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAR achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.71% return.
DFAR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 15.60%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAR vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 15.09% | -1.85% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.71% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAR and XLRI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAR vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
DFAR
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DFAR vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAR | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAR vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAR | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.27% | -7.12% | -25.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.54% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.05% | -1.65% | -12.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility
DFAR vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAR | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.74% | 10.99% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 10.99% | +8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 10.99% | +8.17% |
DFAR vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAR vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than XLRI's 12.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 2.68% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 3.06% | 1.69% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.24% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DFAR and XLRI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DFAR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFAR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLRI.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 2.68% for DFAR.
DFAR is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFAR and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for DFAR and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer