PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAR vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAR vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAR achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.71% return.


DFAR

1D
0.73%
1M
0.69%
YTD
15.09%
6M
15.60%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
10Y*

XLRI

1D
1.31%
1M
1.23%
YTD
6.71%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAR vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFAR and XLRI is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAR vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAR
DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAR vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFARXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

DFAR vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAR vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFARXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.27%

-7.12%

-25.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.54%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.05%

-1.65%

-12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

Volatility

DFAR vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFARXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

10.99%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

10.99%

+8.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

10.99%

+8.17%

DFAR vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAR vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than XLRI's 12.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
2.68%2.97%2.89%3.06%1.69%
XLRI
State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
12.24%6.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DFAR and XLRI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, DFAR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFAR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLRI.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 2.68% for DFAR.

DFAR is categorized as REIT, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFAR and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAR and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer