PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAR vs. XLRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAR vs. XLRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAR achieves a 15.09% return, which is significantly higher than XLRE's 12.35% return.


DFAR

1D
0.73%
1M
0.69%
YTD
15.09%
6M
15.60%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
10Y*

XLRE

1D
1.41%
1M
1.06%
YTD
12.35%
6M
12.83%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
6.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAR vs. XLRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
15.09%1.31%5.25%11.04%-12.16%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
12.35%2.63%5.09%12.36%-13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAR and XLRE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.99

The correlation between DFAR and XLRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAR vs. XLRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAR
DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRE
XLRE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAR vs. XLRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFARXLREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

1.18

+0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.95

3.23

+1.72

DFAR vs. XLRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the XLRE Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAR and XLRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFAR vs. XLRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum XLRE drawdown of -38.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and XLRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFARXLREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.27%

-38.83%

+6.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-8.33%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.64%

-16.74%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.72%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.05%

-9.56%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

3.04%

-0.35%

Volatility

DFAR vs. XLRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) is 5.04%, while Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that DFAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFARXLREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

5.35%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

10.63%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

14.17%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.16%

19.13%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.16%

20.45%

-1.29%

DFAR vs. XLRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFAR vs. XLRE - Dividend Comparison

DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than XLRE's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
2.68%2.97%2.89%3.06%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLRE
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund
3.15%3.45%3.43%3.31%3.70%2.61%3.15%3.06%3.78%3.25%4.22%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFAR and XLRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLRE has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to DFAR (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAR dropped -32.27% vs XLRE's -38.83%.

On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 11.71% vs 11.31% for XLRE. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, DFAR has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFAR.

XLRE has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.68% for DFAR.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFAR and 0.13% for XLRE.

DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAR and XLRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer