DFAR vs. SRVR

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. DFAR is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAR returned 10.69%/yr vs 3.82%/yr for SRVR. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAR charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SRVR.

Performance

DFAR vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAR achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 6.97% return.

DFAR

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.52%
• 6M: 14.06%
• YTD: 19.23%
• 1Y: 18.67%
• 3Y*: 10.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SRVR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -9.67%
• 6M: -0.69%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 1Y: -5.19%
• 3Y*: 3.82%
• 5Y*: -3.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAR vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF	19.23%	1.31%	5.25%	11.04%	-12.16%
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	6.97%	-1.99%	2.70%	6.84%	-15.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAR and SRVR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between DFAR and SRVR has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

DFAR vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAR

DFAR Risk / Return Rank: 50
DFAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DFAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
DFAR Omega Ratio Rank: 46
DFAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
DFAR Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SRVR

SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 6
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAR vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFAR	SRVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	-0.30	+1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	-0.31	+2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.96	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	-0.35	+2.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	-0.68	+7.68

DFAR vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAR and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFAR vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAR drawdown since its inception was -32.27%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAR and SRVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAR	SRVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.27%	-40.99%	+8.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-14.98%	+6.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.64%	-18.34%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-21.67%	+21.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.85%	-15.28%	+1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	7.61%	-4.94%

Volatility

DFAR vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) at 4.16%. This indicates that DFAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAR	SRVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.18%	4.16%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	14.01%	-3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.92%	17.25%	-3.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.12%	19.84%	-0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	21.40%	-2.28%

DFAR vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAR has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAR vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

DFAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than SRVR's 2.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF	2.60%	2.97%	2.89%	3.06%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF	2.86%	2.67%	2.00%	3.69%	1.70%	1.19%	1.59%	1.61%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAR and SRVR in my portfolio?

DFAR and SRVR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFAR or SRVR?

DFAR has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to SRVR (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAR dropped -32.27% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

Which ETF is better, DFAR or SRVR?

On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 10.69% vs 3.82% for SRVR. On fees, DFAR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAR or SRVR?

Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 3.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAR or SRVR?

DFAR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for SRVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAR or SRVR?

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.60% for DFAR.

What is the main difference between DFAR and SRVR?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DFAR and 0.49% for SRVR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.