DFAE vs. TJUN
DFAE (Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
DFAE vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAE achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.
DFAE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 25.28%
- 6M
- 27.97%
- 1Y
- 49.72%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAE vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFAE Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF | 25.28% | 17.99% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAE and TJUN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAE vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
DFAE
TJUN
DFAE vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAE | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAE | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 2.48 | -1.85 |
Drawdowns
DFAE vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAE drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAE and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAE | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.21% | -4.47% | -27.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | 0.00% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.31% | -0.59% | -9.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | — | — |
Volatility
DFAE vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAE | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 7.52% | +11.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 7.52% | +10.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 7.52% | +10.32% |
DFAE vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAE vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
DFAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAE Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF | 1.75% | 2.20% | 2.35% | 2.43% | 2.85% | 1.63% | 0.01% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAE and TJUN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFAE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFAE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
DFAE has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
DFAE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DFAE and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for DFAE and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer