PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAE vs. DFAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAE vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAE achieves a 25.28% return, which is significantly higher than DFAC's 12.69% return.


DFAE

1D
-0.83%
1M
4.78%
YTD
25.28%
6M
27.97%
1Y
49.72%
3Y*
23.46%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*

DFAC

1D
0.70%
1M
4.24%
YTD
12.69%
6M
12.80%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAE vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
25.28%31.48%7.68%12.63%-17.52%-6.78%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
12.69%15.66%19.61%21.96%-14.93%9.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAE and DFAC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.66

The correlation between DFAE and DFAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAE vs. DFAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAE
DFAC

Technology

34.8%
28.4%

Financial Services

17.1%
14.4%

Industrials

10.2%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.7%

Basic Materials

7.7%
3.2%

Communication Services

6.1%
8.4%

Energy

4.2%
5.9%

Healthcare

3.5%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.9%

Utilities

2.4%
1.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.2%

Technology

DFAE
34.8%
DFAC
28.4%

Financial Services

DFAE
17.1%
DFAC
14.4%

Industrials

DFAE
10.2%
DFAC
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAE
9.1%
DFAC
10.7%

Basic Materials

DFAE
7.7%
DFAC
3.2%

Communication Services

DFAE
6.1%
DFAC
8.4%

Energy

DFAE
4.2%
DFAC
5.9%

Healthcare

DFAE
3.5%
DFAC
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFAE
3.3%
DFAC
4.9%

Utilities

DFAE
2.4%
DFAC
1.9%

Real Estate

DFAE
1.5%
DFAC
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAE vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAE
DFAE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
DFAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAC
DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAE vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAEDFACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

3.54

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.10

15.71

-0.61

DFAE vs. DFAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAE Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAE and DFAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAEDFACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

2.47

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.71

-0.09

Drawdowns

DFAE vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAE drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAE and DFAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAEDFACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.21%

-23.12%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-8.49%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.12%

-20.02%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.07%

0.00%

-2.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.31%

-5.45%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

1.91%

+1.39%

Volatility

DFAE vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF (DFAE) has a higher volatility of 8.00% compared to Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) at 2.93%. This indicates that DFAE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAEDFACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.00%

2.93%

+5.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.56%

8.98%

+7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

12.15%

+6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

17.12%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

17.12%

+0.72%

DFAE vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAC's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAE vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison

DFAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than DFAC's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
0.90%0.97%1.03%1.20%1.50%0.88%0.00%
DFAE
Dimensional Emerging Core Equity Market ETF
1.75%2.20%2.35%2.43%2.85%1.63%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAE and DFAC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAE has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to DFAC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAE dropped -32.21% vs DFAC's -23.12%.

On 3-year performance, DFAE leads with 23.46% vs 21.06% for DFAC. On fees, DFAC is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, DFAC has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAE has performed better with a 23.46% return vs 21.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAC is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DFAE.

DFAE has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.90% for DFAC.

DFAE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DFAC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DFAE and 0.17% for DFAC.

DFAE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAE and DFAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer