DFAC vs. SLVAX
DFAC (Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF) and SLVAX (Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund) are both funds - DFAC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while SLVAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 5 years, DFAC returned 11.69%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for SLVAX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAC charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for SLVAX.
Performance
DFAC vs. SLVAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAC achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly lower than SLVAX's 13.40% return.
DFAC
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 25.95%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
SLVAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 12.88%
- 1Y
- 36.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
DFAC vs. SLVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 10.46% | 15.66% | 19.61% | 21.96% | -14.93% | 9.55% |
SLVAX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund | 13.40% | 27.60% | 12.53% | 5.56% | -1.09% | 1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAC and SLVAX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DFAC and SLVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAC vs. SLVAX — Risk / Return Rank
DFAC
SLVAX
DFAC vs. SLVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund (SLVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFAC | SLVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.53 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 4.10 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.40 | 16.75 | -3.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFAC vs. SLVAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAC drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum SLVAX drawdown of -60.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAC and SLVAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAC | SLVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.12% | -60.01% | +36.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.49% | -9.03% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.02% | -14.83% | -5.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.12% | -18.44% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | -1.33% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -9.30% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.20% | -0.26% |
Volatility
DFAC vs. SLVAX - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund (SLVAX) at 4.14%. This indicates that DFAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAC | SLVAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 4.14% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 9.32% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 12.20% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 15.93% | +1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 18.70% | -1.56% |
DFAC vs. SLVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAC has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVAX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFAC vs. SLVAX - Dividend Comparison
DFAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than SLVAX's 7.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAC Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF | 0.92% | 0.97% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 1.50% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVAX Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund | 7.53% | 8.54% | 3.46% | 3.60% | 1.38% | 5.91% | 7.52% | 6.96% | 4.83% | 3.86% | 7.19% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAC and SLVAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAC has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to SLVAX (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAC dropped -23.12% vs SLVAX's -60.01%.
SLVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAC and SLVAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer