PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAC vs. ESGU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFAC vs. ESGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFAC vs. ESGU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
-1.60%15.66%19.61%21.96%-14.93%9.51%
ESGU
iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF
-4.83%16.90%24.31%25.79%-20.27%11.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAC achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly higher than ESGU's -4.83% return.


DFAC

1D
2.78%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
1.24%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*

ESGU

1D
2.93%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-4.83%
6M
-2.32%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAC vs. ESGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAC has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFAC vs. ESGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAC
DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAC vs. ESGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFACESGUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

0.92

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.42

+0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.45

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.28

6.77

+0.51

DFAC vs. ESGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAC Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the ESGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAC and ESGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFACESGUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.92

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.74

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between DFAC and ESGU is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DFAC vs. ESGU - Dividend Comparison

DFAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than ESGU's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
1.03%0.97%1.03%1.20%1.50%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGU
iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF
1.07%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%

Drawdowns

DFAC vs. ESGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAC drawdown since its inception was -23.12%, smaller than the maximum ESGU drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAC and ESGU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFACESGUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.12%

-33.87%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.79%

-12.35%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.94%

-6.59%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-4.96%

-0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

2.65%

+0.06%

Volatility

DFAC vs. ESGU - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) and iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFACESGUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

5.42%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

9.77%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.51%

18.75%

-0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

17.33%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

18.70%

-1.40%