LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. (LFE.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO).
Performance
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFE.TO Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. | -3.52% | 30.06% | 108.15% | 59.77% | -30.86% | 69.79% | -35.91% | 97.52% | -64.57% | 33.07% |
DFN.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp. | 0.09% | 46.96% | 38.64% | -19.97% | 9.39% | 37.70% | -11.45% | 27.39% | -19.31% | 13.51% |
Fundamentals
LFE.TO:
CA$85.14M
DFN.TO:
CA$996.18M
LFE.TO:
CA$5.91
DFN.TO:
CA$2.66
LFE.TO:
1.17
DFN.TO:
2.74
LFE.TO:
0.02
DFN.TO:
0.09
LFE.TO:
2.44
DFN.TO:
6.97
LFE.TO:
0.73
DFN.TO:
0.91
LFE.TO:
CA$32.15M
DFN.TO:
CA$138.51M
LFE.TO:
CA$28.94M
DFN.TO:
CA$125.98M
LFE.TO:
CA$81.89M
DFN.TO:
CA$382.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFE.TO achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than DFN.TO's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, LFE.TO has outperformed DFN.TO with an annualized return of 17.66%, while DFN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.11% annualized return.
LFE.TO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- 18.36%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 55.72%
- 5Y*
- 25.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.66%
DFN.TO
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 15.40%
- 1Y
- 57.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LFE.TO
DFN.TO
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. (LFE.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFE.TO | DFN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 3.16 | -1.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 3.96 | -2.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.68 | -0.40 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 4.93 | -3.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 23.37 | -16.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFE.TO | DFN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 3.16 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.37 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.31 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between LFE.TO and DFN.TO is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO - Dividend Comparison
LFE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.92%, more than DFN.TO's 15.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFE.TO Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. | 15.92% | 16.33% | 12.11% | 0.00% | 9.55% | 1.32% | 10.41% | 2.44% | 4.50% | 14.13% | 4.54% | 2.47% |
DFN.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp. | 15.09% | 16.06% | 17.92% | 14.87% | 15.94% | 15.00% | 11.83% | 13.99% | 15.54% | 12.00% | 11.17% | 11.76% |
Drawdowns
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFE.TO drawdown since its inception was -89.14%, which is greater than DFN.TO's maximum drawdown of -73.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFE.TO and DFN.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFE.TO | DFN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.14% | -73.88% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.46% | -11.45% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.68% | -55.26% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.11% | -58.39% | -22.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.23% | -7.12% | -5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.72% | -11.58% | -42.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.47% | 2.42% | +3.05% |
Volatility
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. (LFE.TO) and Dividend 15 Split Corp. (DFN.TO) have volatilities of 11.55% and 11.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LFE.TO | DFN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.55% | 11.02% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.07% | 14.59% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 18.21% | +8.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.22% | 25.92% | +16.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.51% | 30.31% | +19.20% |
Financials
LFE.TO vs. DFN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. and Dividend 15 Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities