DF.TO vs. DGS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) and Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DF.TO or DGS.TO.
Key characteristics
DF.TO | DGS.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 26.12% | 27.36% |
1Y Return | 22.47% | 18.66% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 1.33% | 11.20% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 7.46% | 15.72% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 4.29% | 8.43% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.57 | 0.52 |
Daily Std Dev | 40.70% | 33.35% |
Max Drawdown | -83.80% | -85.18% |
Current Drawdown | -20.58% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
DF.TO | DGS.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$142.49M | CA$260.87M |
EPS | -CA$0.30 | CA$0.72 |
PE Ratio | 5.80 | 8.31 |
PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Revenue (TTM) | CA$0.00 | CA$64.23M |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$0.00 | -CA$3.80M |
Correlation
The correlation between DF.TO and DGS.TO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DF.TO having a 26.12% return and DGS.TO slightly higher at 27.36%. Over the past 10 years, DF.TO has underperformed DGS.TO with an annualized return of 4.29%, while DGS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) and Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Dividend Comparison
DF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than DGS.TO's 8.21% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II | 2.01% | 0.00% | 12.99% | 14.42% | 6.80% | 11.79% | 8.70% | 13.64% | 13.72% | 19.47% | 14.25% | 23.11% |
Dividend Growth Split Corp. | 8.21% | 5.86% | 17.42% | 14.68% | 5.88% | 15.18% | 24.93% | 14.85% | 15.33% | 17.91% | 13.11% | 11.82% |
Drawdowns
DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DF.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, roughly equal to the maximum DGS.TO drawdown of -85.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DF.TO and DGS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) at 7.21%. This indicates that DF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dividend 15 Split Corp. II and Dividend Growth Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities