PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DF.TO vs. DGS.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


DF.TODGS.TO
YTD Return26.12%27.36%
1Y Return22.47%18.66%
3Y Return (Ann)1.33%11.20%
5Y Return (Ann)7.46%15.72%
10Y Return (Ann)4.29%8.43%
Sharpe Ratio0.570.52
Daily Std Dev40.70%33.35%
Max Drawdown-83.80%-85.18%
Current Drawdown-20.58%0.00%

Fundamentals


DF.TODGS.TO
Market CapCA$142.49MCA$260.87M
EPS-CA$0.30CA$0.72
PE Ratio5.808.31
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Revenue (TTM)CA$0.00CA$64.23M
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$0.00-CA$3.80M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between DF.TO and DGS.TO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DF.TO having a 26.12% return and DGS.TO slightly higher at 27.36%. Over the past 10 years, DF.TO has underperformed DGS.TO with an annualized return of 4.29%, while DGS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
68.70%
151.90%
DF.TO
DGS.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Dividend 15 Split Corp. II

Dividend Growth Split Corp.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) and Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DF.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DF.TO, currently valued at 0.47, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.47
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DF.TO, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.00
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DF.TO, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.12
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DF.TO, currently valued at 0.30, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DF.TO, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.18
DGS.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.000.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.10
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for DGS.TO, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.06

DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which roughly equals the DGS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of DF.TO and DGS.TO.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.47
0.41
DF.TO
DGS.TO

Dividends

DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Dividend Comparison

DF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than DGS.TO's 8.21% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
DF.TO
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II
2.01%0.00%12.99%14.42%6.80%11.79%8.70%13.64%13.72%19.47%14.25%23.11%
DGS.TO
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
8.21%5.86%17.42%14.68%5.88%15.18%24.93%14.85%15.33%17.91%13.11%11.82%

Drawdowns

DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DF.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.80%, roughly equal to the maximum DGS.TO drawdown of -85.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DF.TO and DGS.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-26.50%
-4.56%
DF.TO
DGS.TO

Volatility

DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.81% compared to Dividend Growth Split Corp. (DGS.TO) at 7.21%. This indicates that DF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.81%
7.21%
DF.TO
DGS.TO

Financials

DF.TO vs. DGS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dividend 15 Split Corp. II and Dividend Growth Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items