PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEXC vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEXC vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEXC achieves a 27.87% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -27.96% return.


DEXC

1D
-3.71%
1M
-4.67%
6M
22.70%
YTD
27.87%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
5.26%
1M
44.38%
6M
-15.07%
YTD
-27.96%
1Y
240.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEXC vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
DEXC
Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF
27.87%27.13%-1.63%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-27.96%-44.36%-28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between DEXC and SMST is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEXC vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEXC
DEXC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DEXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DEXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEXC vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEXCSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.83

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.70

5.47

+6.23

DEXC vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEXC and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEXC vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEXC drawdown since its inception was -15.07%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEXC and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEXCSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.07%

-99.25%

+84.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-85.39%

+72.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.26%

-97.17%

+86.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-90.89%

+88.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

44.09%

-40.36%

Volatility

DEXC vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) is 12.51%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.59%. This indicates that DEXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEXCSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

56.59%

-44.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.20%

135.88%

-112.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.72%

149.23%

-124.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.15%

167.74%

-145.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.15%

167.74%

-145.59%

DEXC vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEXC has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEXC vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

DEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


DEXC and SMST have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (56.59%) compared to DEXC (12.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEXC dropped -15.07% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 240.03% vs 43.48% for DEXC. On fees, DEXC is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, DEXC has been the lower-risk option at 12.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 240.03% return vs 43.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEXC is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

DEXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

DEXC is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DEXC and 1.29% for SMST.

DEXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEXC and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer