DEXC vs. ECOW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DEXC (Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF) and ECOW (Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. DEXC is actively managed, while ECOW is passively managed. Over the past year, DEXC returned 39.06% vs 29.31% for ECOW. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DEXC charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ECOW.

Performance

DEXC vs. ECOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEXC achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly higher than ECOW's 13.04% return.

DEXC

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -6.85%
• 6M: 13.02%
• YTD: 22.11%
• 1Y: 39.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.12%

ECOW

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 3.22%
• 6M: 5.35%
• YTD: 13.04%
• 1Y: 29.31%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF	$1.25M	$1.39M	$1.60M
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	$617.95K	$706.50K	$1.39M

DEXC vs. ECOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF	22.11%	27.13%	-1.63%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	13.04%	32.50%	-3.47%

Correlation

The correlation between DEXC and ECOW is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2024	0.68

The correlation between DEXC and ECOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEXC vs. ECOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEXC	ECOW
Technology	48.1%	4.2%
Financial Services	14.7%	-
Industrials	9.3%	10.7%
Basic Materials	6.5%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	13.9%
Communication Services	3.2%	15.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	11.6%
Energy	3.1%	10.4%
Healthcare	2.8%	3.7%
Utilities	1.9%	6.9%
Real Estate	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

DEXC vs. ECOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEXC

DEXC Risk / Return Rank: 64
DEXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
DEXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DEXC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
DEXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
DEXC Martin Ratio Rank: 67

ECOW

ECOW Risk / Return Rank: 83
ECOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ECOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ECOW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ECOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ECOW Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEXC vs. ECOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) and Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEXC	ECOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.02	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.74	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.37	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.56	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	9.38	-1.29

DEXC vs. ECOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEXC Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the ECOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEXC and ECOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEXC vs. ECOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEXC drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum ECOW drawdown of -40.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEXC and ECOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEXC	ECOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.31%	-40.27%	+21.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.31%	-8.35%	-9.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.30%	-3.58%	-10.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.92%	-10.94%	+8.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	3.16%	+1.63%

Volatility

DEXC vs. ECOW - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC) has a higher volatility of 10.08% compared to Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF (ECOW) at 3.51%. This indicates that DEXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEXC	ECOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.08%	3.51%	+6.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.42%	11.99%	+12.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.90%	14.81%	+11.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.68%	17.73%	+4.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.68%	20.04%	+2.64%

DEXC vs. ECOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEXC has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than ECOW's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEXC vs. ECOW - Dividend Comparison

DEXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than ECOW's 4.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DEXC Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF	1.67%	1.97%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ECOW Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF	4.44%	5.20%	7.35%	5.46%	7.50%	4.39%	3.35%	8.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEXC and ECOW in my portfolio?

DEXC and ECOW have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEXC or ECOW?

DEXC has higher volatility (10.08%) compared to ECOW (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEXC dropped -18.31% vs ECOW's -40.27%.

Which ETF is better, DEXC or ECOW?

On 1-year performance, DEXC leads with 39.06% vs 29.31% for ECOW. On fees, DEXC is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, ECOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEXC or ECOW?

Over the 1-year period, DEXC has performed better with a 39.06% return vs 29.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEXC or ECOW?

DEXC is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ECOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEXC or ECOW?

ECOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.67% for DEXC.

What is the main difference between DEXC and ECOW?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DEXC and 0.70% for ECOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ECOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.