PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DESK vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DESK vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DESK achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.


DESK

1D
-0.49%
1M
6.07%
YTD
5.73%
6M
1.92%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DESK vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DESK
Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF
5.73%-10.42%16.01%18.89%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
42.58%5.93%8.52%-10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DESK and GSG is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023

-0.02

The correlation between DESK and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DESK vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DESK
DESK Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DESK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DESK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DESK Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DESK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
DESK Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DESK vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DESKGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.40

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

5.47

-5.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.19

14.39

-14.20

DESK vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DESK Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DESK and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DESKGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

2.26

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

-0.09

+0.49

Drawdowns

DESK vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DESK drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DESK and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESKGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.65%

-89.62%

+60.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-9.46%

-15.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.46%

-56.95%

+43.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.04%

-63.71%

+52.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.82%

3.59%

+8.23%

Volatility

DESK vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) is 5.71%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that DESK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESKGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

7.65%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.45%

20.42%

-5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.97%

22.95%

-2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

22.61%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.68%

22.03%

+3.65%

DESK vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DESK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DESK vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

DESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
DESK
Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF
5.09%5.15%3.78%1.73%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DESK and GSG have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to DESK (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DESK dropped -28.65% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 51.52% vs 2.26% for DESK. On fees, DESK is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DESK has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 51.52% return vs 2.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DESK is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

DESK has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

DESK is categorized as REIT, while GSG is Commodities. DESK tracks MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DESK and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DESK and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer