DESK vs. GQRE
DESK (Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF) and GQRE (FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund) are both REIT funds - DESK tracks the MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GQRE tracks the Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DESK returned 4.21% vs 12.75% for GQRE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DESK charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GQRE.
Performance
DESK vs. GQRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DESK having a 8.24% return and GQRE slightly higher at 8.29%.
DESK
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQRE
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
DESK vs. GQRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF | 8.24% | -10.42% | 16.01% | 18.89% |
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 8.29% | 8.27% | 6.09% | 12.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DESK and GQRE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DESK and GQRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
DESK vs. GQRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DESK
GQRE
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
DESK
GQRE
Basic Materials
DESK
-
GQRE
Communication Services
DESK
-
GQRE
Consumer Cyclical
DESK
-
GQRE
Consumer Defensive
DESK
-
GQRE
Energy
DESK
-
GQRE
-
Financial Services
DESK
-
GQRE
Healthcare
DESK
-
GQRE
Industrials
DESK
-
GQRE
Technology
DESK
-
GQRE
Utilities
DESK
-
GQRE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DESK vs. GQRE — Risk / Return Rank
DESK
GQRE
DESK vs. GQRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) and FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DESK | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.20 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.17 | 1.26 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.36 | 4.80 | -4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DESK | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.10 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.30 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
DESK vs. GQRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DESK drawdown since its inception was -28.65%, smaller than the maximum GQRE drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DESK and GQRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DESK | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.65% | -41.87% | +13.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | -10.15% | -14.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -2.58% | -8.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -9.23% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.83% | 2.66% | +9.17% |
Volatility
DESK vs. GQRE - Volatility Comparison
Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF (DESK) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) at 3.56%. This indicates that DESK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DESK | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 3.56% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.63% | 8.80% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 11.66% | +8.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 16.46% | +9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 17.66% | +8.04% |
DESK vs. GQRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DESK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DESK vs. GQRE - Dividend Comparison
DESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than GQRE's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DESK Vaneck Office And Commercial REIT ETF | 4.97% | 5.15% | 3.78% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 4.32% | 4.75% | 3.77% | 2.91% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 4.29% | 3.22% | 1.97% | 4.16% | 2.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DESK and GQRE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DESK has higher volatility (5.86%) compared to GQRE (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DESK dropped -28.65% vs GQRE's -41.87%.
On 1-year performance, GQRE leads with 12.75% vs 4.21% for DESK. On fees, GQRE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GQRE has performed better with a 12.75% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GQRE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DESK.
DESK has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 4.32% for GQRE.
DESK tracks MarketVector US Listed Office And Commercial REITS Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR). They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DESK and 0.45% for GQRE.
GQRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DESK and GQRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer