PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DESIX vs. FCEEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DESIX achieves a 16.22% return, which is significantly lower than FCEEX's 23.85% return.


DESIX

1D
0.37%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
16.22%
6M
16.51%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*

FCEEX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
23.85%
6M
24.90%
1Y
43.45%
3Y*
25.30%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DESIX
DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
16.22%27.87%6.66%14.24%-18.07%24.59%14.05%9.99%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
23.85%34.81%10.51%12.52%-16.96%-1.29%10.19%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DESIX and FCEEX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.94

The correlation between DESIX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DESIX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DESIX
DESIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FCEEX
FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DESIXFCEEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.39

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

12.69

-3.78

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DESIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DESIX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DESIX drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FCEEX drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DESIX and FCEEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESIXFCEEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-34.68%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-12.98%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-15.47%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.09%

-33.39%

+4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.23%

-5.30%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-11.19%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.41%

3.45%

-0.04%

Volatility

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX) is 10.12%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) has a volatility of 11.79%. This indicates that DESIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCEEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESIXFCEEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.12%

11.79%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

18.41%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.10%

20.60%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.96%

17.56%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

18.73%

+0.11%

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DESIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

DESIX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

DESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than FCEEX's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DESIX
DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
2.27%2.63%2.79%2.85%2.51%22.49%1.38%1.99%1.21%
FCEEX
Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor
2.38%3.29%4.17%4.36%4.08%3.38%2.98%0.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DESIX and FCEEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCEEX has higher volatility (11.79%) compared to DESIX (10.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DESIX dropped -36.03% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

FCEEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DESIX and FCEEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer