PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DESIX vs. DRESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DESIX vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DESIX achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly higher than DRESX's 20.11% return.


DESIX

1D
0.99%
1M
7.89%
YTD
22.62%
6M
24.35%
1Y
43.70%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
12.23%
10Y*

DRESX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
20.11%
6M
21.52%
1Y
41.84%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DESIX vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DESIX
DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
22.62%27.87%6.66%14.24%-18.07%24.59%14.05%16.69%-6.48%
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
20.11%24.08%14.86%10.30%-21.17%15.93%33.56%33.70%-17.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DESIX and DRESX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2018

0.80

The correlation between DESIX and DRESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DESIX vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DESIX
DESIX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DRESX
DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DESIX vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DESIXDRESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.52

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

4.22

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.74

13.96

-0.22

DESIX vs. DRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DESIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the DRESX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DESIX and DRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DESIXDRESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.80

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.59

+0.05

Drawdowns

DESIX vs. DRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DESIX drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than DRESX's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DESIX and DRESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DESIXDRESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-33.38%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-10.16%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-17.65%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.09%

-25.88%

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.25%

+5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-9.91%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.06%

+0.18%

Volatility

DESIX vs. DRESX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio (DESIX) has a higher volatility of 6.77% compared to Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) at 6.11%. This indicates that DESIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DESIXDRESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

6.11%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.64%

13.03%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

15.38%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.53%

14.71%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.63%

15.90%

+2.73%

DESIX vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DESIX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than DRESX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

DESIX vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

DESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than DRESX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DESIX
DFA Emerging Markets Sustainability Core 1 Portfolio
2.15%2.63%2.79%2.85%2.51%22.49%1.38%1.99%1.21%
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
1.87%2.25%0.68%1.09%0.00%0.04%0.65%0.41%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DESIX and DRESX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DESIX has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to DRESX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DESIX dropped -36.03% vs DRESX's -33.38%.

DESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DESIX and DRESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer