PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMSX vs. RNLSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMSX vs. RNLSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) and Renault SA (RNLSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMSX achieves a 10.80% return, which is significantly higher than RNLSY's -18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMSX has outperformed RNLSY with an annualized return of 9.34%, while RNLSY has yielded a comparatively lower -6.30% annualized return.


DEMSX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
10.80%
6M
11.82%
1Y
22.40%
3Y*
14.65%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
9.34%

RNLSY

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-21.57%
1Y
-32.37%
3Y*
1.03%
5Y*
-2.36%
10Y*
-6.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMSX vs. RNLSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
10.80%19.01%4.92%16.32%-15.30%19.54%13.82%14.89%-17.55%33.32%
RNLSY
Renault SA
-18.43%-10.26%22.83%23.45%-3.50%-21.42%-1.07%-18.36%-36.07%22.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMSX and RNLSY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2014

0.40

The correlation between DEMSX and RNLSY shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMSX vs. RNLSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMSX
DEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

RNLSY
RNLSY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
RNLSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNLSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNLSY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
RNLSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNLSY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMSX vs. RNLSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) and Renault SA (RNLSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMSXRNLSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.86

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

-0.87

+3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.13

-1.34

+9.47

DEMSX vs. RNLSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the RNLSY Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMSX and RNLSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMSXRNLSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

-0.90

+2.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

-0.06

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

-0.15

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-0.09

+0.70

Drawdowns

DEMSX vs. RNLSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.70%, smaller than the maximum RNLSY drawdown of -86.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMSX and RNLSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMSXRNLSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.70%

-86.01%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-37.45%

+27.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-43.13%

+25.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-48.91%

+24.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.28%

-86.01%

+38.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-64.18%

+61.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-43.67%

+30.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

24.15%

-21.26%

Volatility

DEMSX vs. RNLSY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) is 4.78%, while Renault SA (RNLSY) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that DEMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RNLSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMSXRNLSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

10.46%

-5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

24.76%

-13.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.23%

36.25%

-23.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

40.21%

-26.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.79%

42.83%

-28.04%

Dividends

DEMSX vs. RNLSY - Dividend Comparison

DEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than RNLSY's 8.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
3.45%3.79%3.27%2.94%4.47%10.20%2.25%3.11%5.02%3.41%3.74%3.24%
RNLSY
Renault SA
8.13%5.91%4.11%0.68%0.00%0.00%2.74%8.50%6.70%7.27%6.10%2.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMSX and RNLSY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNLSY has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to DEMSX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMSX dropped -66.70% vs RNLSY's -86.01%.

DEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMSX and RNLSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer