PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMSX vs. DEMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) and DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMSX achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than DEMGX's 17.01% return.


DEMSX

1D
0.51%
1M
1.20%
YTD
11.52%
6M
12.50%
1Y
24.34%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.41%

DEMGX

1D
0.93%
1M
4.11%
YTD
17.01%
6M
18.89%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
11.52%19.01%4.92%16.32%-15.30%19.54%13.82%14.89%1.85%
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
17.01%24.27%4.62%17.19%-12.98%14.64%8.55%11.08%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMSX and DEMGX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2018

0.97

The correlation between DEMSX and DEMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMSX vs. DEMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMSX
DEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMGX
DEMGX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DEMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) and DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMSXDEMGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.61

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

3.49

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.49

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

3.18

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.47

11.63

-3.17

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the DEMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMSX and DEMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMSXDEMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.61

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.68

-0.07

Drawdowns

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMSX drawdown since its inception was -66.70%, which is greater than DEMGX's maximum drawdown of -42.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMSX and DEMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMSXDEMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.70%

-42.40%

-24.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-11.10%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-17.68%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.40%

-26.19%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

0.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-7.59%

-6.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.04%

-0.16%

Volatility

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio (DEMSX) and DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio (DEMGX) have volatilities of 4.74% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMSXDEMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.92%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

11.30%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

13.77%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

13.46%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.80%

15.77%

-0.97%

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMSX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMGX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMSX vs. DEMGX - Dividend Comparison

DEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than DEMGX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMGX
DFA Emerging Markets Targeted Value Portfolio
4.25%4.98%4.60%5.21%4.28%10.93%2.23%3.17%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DEMSX
DFA Emerging Markets Small Cap Portfolio
3.42%3.79%3.27%2.94%4.47%10.20%2.25%3.11%5.02%3.41%3.74%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DEMSX and DEMGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DEMGX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to DEMSX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMSX dropped -66.70% vs DEMGX's -42.40%.

DEMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMSX and DEMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer