PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMIX vs. LCSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMIX achieves a 145.11% return, which is significantly higher than LCSMX's 72.12% return.


DEMIX

1D
4.36%
1M
29.09%
YTD
145.11%
6M
162.34%
1Y
271.84%
3Y*
74.82%
5Y*
30.44%
10Y*
23.71%

LCSMX

1D
0.90%
1M
14.54%
YTD
72.12%
6M
78.24%
1Y
133.51%
3Y*
33.00%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
145.11%86.79%6.52%17.59%-28.66%-2.08%26.09%24.33%-19.86%
LCSMX
Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund
72.12%51.52%-13.60%16.26%-27.25%4.73%35.72%6.81%1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMIX and LCSMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018

0.79

The correlation between DEMIX and LCSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMIX vs. LCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMIX
DEMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LCSMX
LCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
LCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMIXLCSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.79

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.05

8.72

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

47.63

31.51

+16.12

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMIX Sharpe Ratio is 6.06, which is higher than the LCSMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMIX and LCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMIX drawdown since its inception was -63.15%, which is greater than LCSMX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMIX and LCSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMIXLCSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.15%

-39.72%

-23.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.01%

-15.39%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.62%

-23.31%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.96%

-39.72%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.43%

-13.68%

-4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

4.25%

+1.49%

Volatility

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Volatility Comparison

Delaware Emerging Markets Fund (DEMIX) has a higher volatility of 25.62% compared to Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) at 17.02%. This indicates that DEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMIXLCSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.62%

17.02%

+8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.21%

27.15%

+14.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.34%

29.39%

+15.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.58%

20.37%

+7.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.36%

20.62%

+3.74%

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMIX vs. LCSMX - Dividend Comparison

DEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than LCSMX's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMIX
Delaware Emerging Markets Fund
7.74%18.97%1.99%2.95%1.89%3.42%0.87%0.80%0.65%1.80%0.94%0.30%
LCSMX
Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund
0.58%1.00%1.29%1.22%1.11%3.03%0.48%0.88%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMIX and LCSMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMIX has higher volatility (25.62%) compared to LCSMX (17.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMIX dropped -63.15% vs LCSMX's -39.72%.

DEMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.06 vs 4.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMIX and LCSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer