DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

DEMD.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and FLXX.L (Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEMD.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS Index, while FLXX.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEMD.L returned 10.01%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for FLXX.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEMD.L charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLXX.L.

Performance

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) and Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

DEMD.L is traded in USD, while FLXX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DEMD.L having a 15.99% return and FLXX.L slightly lower at 15.57%.

DEMD.L

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -4.33%
• 6M: 13.70%
• YTD: 15.99%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 10.01%
• 10Y*: 8.89%

FLXX.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.65%
• 6M: 12.59%
• YTD: 15.57%
• 1Y: 23.42%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DEMD.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	15.99%	20.91%	5.26%	21.17%	-12.75%	13.36%	-6.14%	18.40%	-7.50%	5.18%
FLXX.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	15.57%	14.57%	15.19%	9.94%	-9.40%	19.82%	5.10%	23.96%	-8.56%	4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMD.L and FLXX.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017	0.61

The correlation between DEMD.L and FLXX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMD.L

DEMD.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
DEMD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DEMD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
DEMD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 51
DEMD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
DEMD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FLXX.L

FLXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
FLXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FLXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FLXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FLXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
FLXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) and Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEMD.L	FLXX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.36	-0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.48	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.42	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.54	-0.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.20	12.50	-4.30

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FLXX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMD.L and FLXX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMD.L drawdown since its inception was -40.46%, which is greater than FLXX.L's maximum drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMD.L and FLXX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEMD.L	FLXX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.46%	-34.61%	-5.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.63%	-6.69%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.59%	-12.36%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.69%	-23.01%	-4.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.33%	0.00%	-4.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.04%	-5.21%	-4.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	1.90%	+0.66%

Volatility

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXX.L) at 3.62%. This indicates that DEMD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEMD.L	FLXX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	3.62%	+0.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.03%	8.03%	+4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.23%	10.06%	+4.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.05%	13.08%	+1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.67%	14.61%	+2.06%

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMD.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXX.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEMD.L vs. FLXX.L - Dividend Comparison

DEMD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than FLXX.L's 2.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DEMD.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	3.70%	4.42%	7.88%	6.68%	7.48%	4.20%	4.51%	4.13%	4.39%	1.98%	1.68%	4.75%
FLXX.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	2.52%	2.70%	2.40%	2.79%	2.97%	2.30%	2.58%	3.30%	3.23%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEMD.L and FLXX.L in my portfolio?

DEMD.L and FLXX.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DEMD.L or FLXX.L?

On fees, FLXX.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEMD.L or FLXX.L?

FLXX.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMD.L.

What is the main difference between DEMD.L and FLXX.L?

DEMD.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FLXX.L is Dividend. DEMD.L tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS Index, while FLXX.L tracks Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEMD.L and 0.30% for FLXX.L.