PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMCX vs. WXCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 106.86% return, which is significantly higher than WXCIX's 52.50% return.


DEMCX

1D
2.41%
1M
32.99%
YTD
106.86%
6M
124.60%
1Y
243.29%
3Y*
63.82%
5Y*
24.19%
10Y*
20.28%

WXCIX

1D
0.87%
1M
15.91%
YTD
52.50%
6M
58.75%
1Y
92.32%
3Y*
35.63%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
106.86%84.86%5.47%12.30%
WXCIX
William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I
52.50%28.21%13.49%15.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMCX and WXCIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023

0.72

The correlation between DEMCX and WXCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMCX vs. WXCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

WXCIX
WXCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
WXCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WXCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WXCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WXCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
WXCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMCXWXCIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.44

4.17

+2.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.38

5.00

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.86

1.71

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.46

6.14

+5.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

43.69

22.15

+21.54

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMCX Sharpe Ratio is 6.44, which is higher than the WXCIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMCX and WXCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMCXWXCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44

4.17

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

2.04

-1.55

Drawdowns

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, which is greater than WXCIX's maximum drawdown of -19.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and WXCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMCXWXCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.54%

-19.66%

-43.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.11%

-14.78%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-19.66%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-3.15%

-16.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

4.10%

+1.44%

Volatility

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 17.12% compared to William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I (WXCIX) at 10.22%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WXCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMCXWXCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.12%

10.22%

+6.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.79%

19.50%

+14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.41%

22.52%

+15.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.31%

17.99%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.13%

17.99%

+5.14%

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than WXCIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMCX vs. WXCIX - Dividend Comparison

DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.90%, more than WXCIX's 3.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
9.90%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%
WXCIX
William Blair Emerging Markets ex China Growth Fund Class I
3.62%5.52%0.00%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMCX and WXCIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (17.12%) compared to WXCIX (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs WXCIX's -19.66%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.44 vs 4.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMCX and WXCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer