DEMCX vs. FIQGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX).
DEMCX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Jun 10, 1996. FIQGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
DEMCX vs. FIQGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than FIQGX's 7.09% return.
DEMCX
- 1D
- -5.71%
- 1M
- -10.01%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 31.69%
- 1Y
- 115.54%
- 3Y*
- 33.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.13%
FIQGX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 7.09%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 45.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.21%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DEMCX vs. FIQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMCX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C | 10.95% | 84.86% | 5.47% | 16.47% | -29.38% | -3.05% | 24.55% | 23.16% | -4.63% |
FIQGX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z | 7.09% | 31.96% | -3.54% | 20.94% | -11.74% | 6.86% | 17.11% | 19.81% | -1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMCX and FIQGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification — they'll tend to fall together during downturns. For meaningful risk reduction, look for holdings with correlations below 0.5.
DEMCX vs. FIQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQGX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMCX vs. FIQGX — Risk / Return Rank
DEMCX
FIQGX
DEMCX vs. FIQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEMCX | FIQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.87 | 2.59 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | 3.23 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.49 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 3.83 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.22 | 14.50 | +3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEMCX | FIQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.59 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.59 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.65 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
DEMCX vs. FIQGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, which is greater than FIQGX's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and FIQGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMCX | FIQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.54% | -38.41% | -25.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.11% | -9.55% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.75% | -27.36% | -17.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.11% | -7.02% | -14.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -7.02% | -12.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 2.62% | +2.81% |
Volatility
DEMCX vs. FIQGX - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z (FIQGX) at 5.91%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEMCX | FIQGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.00% | 5.91% | +11.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.19% | 9.96% | +19.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.92% | 14.44% | +19.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 14.00% | +9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 16.76% | +5.27% |
Dividends
DEMCX vs. FIQGX - Dividend Comparison
DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.45%, more than FIQGX's 4.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMCX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C | 18.45% | 20.47% | 1.09% | 2.03% | 0.69% | 2.58% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 0.08% |
FIQGX Fidelity Advisor Emerging Markets Discovery Fund Class Z | 4.55% | 4.87% | 4.07% | 2.20% | 1.86% | 12.04% | 0.71% | 1.22% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |