PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMCX vs. FEDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 112.02% return, which is significantly higher than FEDDX's 20.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX has outperformed FEDDX with an annualized return of 20.58%, while FEDDX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.95% annualized return.


DEMCX

1D
2.49%
1M
25.73%
YTD
112.02%
6M
129.18%
1Y
249.82%
3Y*
65.17%
5Y*
24.83%
10Y*
20.58%

FEDDX

1D
0.66%
1M
1.50%
YTD
20.05%
6M
22.07%
1Y
40.71%
3Y*
18.98%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
112.02%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
20.05%31.90%-3.68%20.76%-11.83%6.65%16.96%19.60%-18.90%36.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMCX and FEDDX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2011

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between DEMCX and FEDDX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMCX vs. FEDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDDX
FEDDX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FEDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMCXFEDDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.65

3.13

+3.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.48

4.02

+1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.58

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.10

4.33

+7.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

45.95

16.61

+29.34

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMCX Sharpe Ratio is 6.65, which is higher than the FEDDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMCX and FEDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMCXFEDDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.65

3.13

+3.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.62

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.70

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.58

-0.09

Drawdowns

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, which is greater than FEDDX's maximum drawdown of -42.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and FEDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMCXFEDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.54%

-42.95%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.11%

-9.54%

-11.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-17.29%

-5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.75%

-27.45%

-17.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-42.95%

-4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.16%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.63%

-8.77%

-10.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

2.48%

+3.06%

Volatility

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund (FEDDX) at 4.39%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEDDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMCXFEDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.09%

4.39%

+12.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.83%

10.65%

+23.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.39%

13.20%

+25.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

14.11%

+11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.14%

15.74%

+7.40%

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDDX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMCX vs. FEDDX - Dividend Comparison

DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than FEDDX's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
9.66%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%0.00%
FEDDX
Fidelity Emerging Markets Discovery Fund
3.87%4.65%3.99%2.05%1.69%11.90%0.59%1.05%1.88%1.50%1.36%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMCX and FEDDX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to FEDDX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs FEDDX's -42.95%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 3.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMCX and FEDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer