PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMCX vs. EAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMCX vs. EAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 104.45% return, which is significantly higher than EAD's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX has outperformed EAD with an annualized return of 19.40%, while EAD has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.


DEMCX

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.97%
6M
88.12%
YTD
104.45%
1Y
190.73%
3Y*
62.02%
5Y*
25.35%
10Y*
19.40%

EAD

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.51%
6M
-1.48%
YTD
-0.12%
1Y
-0.03%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMCX vs. EAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
104.45%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%
EAD
Emerging Markets Dividend Fund
-0.12%8.05%15.86%11.94%-23.08%21.62%6.35%27.22%-6.52%7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMCX and EAD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2003

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMCX vs. EAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

EAD
EAD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMCX vs. EAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMCXEADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.01

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.99

-0.00

+8.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.63

-0.02

+29.64

DEMCX vs. EAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.95, which is higher than the EAD Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMCX and EAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEMCX vs. EAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, smaller than the maximum EAD drawdown of -67.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and EAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMCXEADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.54%

-67.37%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.11%

-8.16%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-12.65%

-10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.25%

-29.44%

-12.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-41.54%

-5.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.21%

-2.82%

-13.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

-7.13%

-12.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

2.25%

+4.16%

Volatility

DEMCX vs. EAD - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 25.45% compared to Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD) at 2.00%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMCXEADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.45%

2.00%

+23.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.45%

7.56%

+36.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.04%

9.39%

+38.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

13.61%

+14.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.83%

16.11%

+8.72%

DEMCX vs. EAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EAD's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMCX vs. EAD - Dividend Comparison

DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, which matches EAD's 10.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
10.01%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%0.00%
EAD
Emerging Markets Dividend Fund
10.03%9.47%9.08%9.07%10.97%7.59%8.51%8.44%9.11%8.58%9.62%10.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMCX and EAD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (25.45%) compared to EAD (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs EAD's -67.37%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.95 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMCX and EAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer