DEMCX vs. EAD
DEMCX (Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C) and EAD (Emerging Markets Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX returned 19.40%/yr vs 6.74%/yr for EAD. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEMCX charges 2.17%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for EAD.
Performance
DEMCX vs. EAD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 104.45% return, which is significantly higher than EAD's -0.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX has outperformed EAD with an annualized return of 19.40%, while EAD has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.
DEMCX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 88.12%
- YTD
- 104.45%
- 1Y
- 190.73%
- 3Y*
- 62.02%
- 5Y*
- 25.35%
- 10Y*
- 19.40%
EAD
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.74%
DEMCX vs. EAD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMCX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C | 104.45% | 84.86% | 5.47% | 16.47% | -29.38% | -3.05% | 24.55% | 23.16% | -17.94% | 40.59% |
EAD Emerging Markets Dividend Fund | -0.12% | 8.05% | 15.86% | 11.94% | -23.08% | 21.62% | 6.35% | 27.22% | -6.52% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMCX and EAD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2003 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEMCX vs. EAD — Risk / Return Rank
DEMCX
EAD
DEMCX vs. EAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEMCX | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.01 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.99 | -0.00 | +8.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.63 | -0.02 | +29.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEMCX vs. EAD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, smaller than the maximum EAD drawdown of -67.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and EAD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMCX | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.54% | -67.37% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.11% | -8.16% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.22% | -12.65% | -10.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.25% | -29.44% | -12.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | -41.54% | -5.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.21% | -2.82% | -13.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.58% | -7.13% | -12.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.41% | 2.25% | +4.16% |
Volatility
DEMCX vs. EAD - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 25.45% compared to Emerging Markets Dividend Fund (EAD) at 2.00%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEMCX | EAD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.45% | 2.00% | +23.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.45% | 7.56% | +36.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.04% | 9.39% | +38.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 13.61% | +14.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.83% | 16.11% | +8.72% |
DEMCX vs. EAD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than EAD's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEMCX vs. EAD - Dividend Comparison
DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.01%, which matches EAD's 10.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMCX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C | 10.01% | 20.47% | 1.09% | 2.03% | 0.69% | 2.58% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.03% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
EAD Emerging Markets Dividend Fund | 10.03% | 9.47% | 9.08% | 9.07% | 10.97% | 7.59% | 8.51% | 8.44% | 9.11% | 8.58% | 9.62% | 10.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEMCX and EAD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEMCX has higher volatility (25.45%) compared to EAD (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs EAD's -67.37%.
DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.95 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEMCX and EAD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer