DEMCX vs. CNWIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DEMCX (Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C) and CNWIX (Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX returned 20.58%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for CNWIX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEMCX charges 2.17%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for CNWIX.

Performance

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 112.02% return, which is significantly higher than CNWIX's 51.09% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX has outperformed CNWIX with an annualized return of 20.58%, while CNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.33% annualized return.

DEMCX

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: 25.73%
• YTD: 112.02%
• 6M: 129.18%
• 1Y: 249.82%
• 3Y*: 65.17%
• 5Y*: 24.83%
• 10Y*: 20.58%

CNWIX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 14.41%
• YTD: 51.09%
• 6M: 54.41%
• 1Y: 72.44%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DEMCX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C	112.02%	84.86%	5.47%	16.47%	-29.38%	-3.05%	24.55%	23.16%	-17.94%	40.59%
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	51.09%	19.29%	14.99%	6.60%	-24.35%	-4.70%	54.23%	20.76%	-17.74%	36.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMCX and CNWIX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2008	0.88

The correlation between DEMCX and CNWIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DEMCX vs. CNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMCX

DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 98
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

CNWIX

CNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
CNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
CNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEMCX	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	6.65	3.17	+3.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.48	3.79	+1.69
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.87	1.57	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.10	4.48	+7.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	45.95	16.56	+29.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMCX Sharpe Ratio is 6.65, which is higher than the CNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMCX and CNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEMCX	CNWIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.65	3.17	+3.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	0.49	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89	0.51	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.36	+0.13

Drawdowns

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, which is greater than CNWIX's maximum drawdown of -43.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and CNWIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEMCX	CNWIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.54%	-43.57%	-19.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.11%	-16.28%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.22%	-19.34%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.75%	-37.36%	-7.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.21%	-43.57%	-3.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.63%	-16.43%	-3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.54%	4.39%	+1.15%

Volatility

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I (CNWIX) at 10.53%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEMCX	CNWIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.09%	10.53%	+6.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.83%	20.15%	+13.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.39%	22.99%	+15.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.33%	18.45%	+6.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.14%	24.47%	-1.33%

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CNWIX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEMCX vs. CNWIX - Dividend Comparison

DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than CNWIX's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CNWIX Calamos Evolving World Growth Fund Class I	0.04%	0.06%	0.00%	0.54%	0.97%	2.79%	2.01%	1.04%	0.00%	0.42%	0.00%	0.38%
DEMCX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C	9.66%	20.47%	1.09%	2.03%	0.69%	2.58%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	1.03%	0.08%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEMCX and CNWIX in my portfolio?

DEMCX and CNWIX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEMCX or CNWIX?

DEMCX has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to CNWIX (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs CNWIX's -43.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 3.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.