DEMAX vs. DDVCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX).
DEMAX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Jun 10, 1996. DDVCX is an actively managed fund by Nomura. It was launched on Apr 30, 2002.
Performance
DEMAX vs. DDVCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DEMAX vs. DDVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMAX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 13.26% | 86.33% | 6.25% | 17.34% | -28.85% | -2.32% | 25.54% | 24.05% | -17.32% | 41.62% |
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 0.79% | 9.95% | 5.68% | 1.06% | -4.57% | 20.87% | -0.63% | 19.33% | -3.92% | 12.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEMAX achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly higher than DDVCX's 0.79% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMAX has outperformed DDVCX with an annualized return of 14.09%, while DDVCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
DEMAX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 43.25%
- 1Y
- 104.18%
- 3Y*
- 34.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
DDVCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 3.79%
- 1Y
- 11.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEMAX vs. DDVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEMAX has a 1.42% expense ratio, which is lower than DDVCX's 1.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DEMAX vs. DDVCX — Risk / Return Rank
DEMAX
DDVCX
DEMAX vs. DDVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEMAX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.10 | 0.75 | +2.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 1.13 | +2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.16 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.78 | 0.86 | +3.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.45 | 3.35 | +15.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEMAX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 0.75 | +2.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.32 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.41 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.37 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between DEMAX and DDVCX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DEMAX vs. DDVCX - Dividend Comparison
DEMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.80%, less than DDVCX's 26.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMAX Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 16.80% | 19.03% | 1.74% | 2.76% | 1.60% | 3.16% | 0.56% | 0.57% | 0.34% | 1.59% | 0.70% | 0.03% |
DDVCX Nomura Value Fund Class C | 26.23% | 26.55% | 30.88% | 10.78% | 9.46% | 23.96% | 1.92% | 4.13% | 5.29% | 3.08% | 1.57% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
DEMAX vs. DDVCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEMAX drawdown since its inception was -63.23%, which is greater than DDVCX's maximum drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMAX and DDVCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEMAX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.23% | -54.29% | -8.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.32% | -11.60% | -8.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.15% | -18.71% | -25.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.51% | -37.60% | -8.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.55% | -8.59% | -10.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -9.07% | -9.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | 3.11% | +2.16% |
Volatility
DEMAX vs. DDVCX - Volatility Comparison
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class A (DEMAX) has a higher volatility of 19.13% compared to Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) at 3.92%. This indicates that DEMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DEMAX | DDVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.13% | 3.92% | +15.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.50% | 8.77% | +19.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.35% | 16.13% | +17.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.12% | 14.49% | +8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 17.04% | +4.90% |