PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEM vs. GDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEM vs. GDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly higher than GDE's 9.79% return.


DEM

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.63%
YTD
19.97%
6M
20.75%
1Y
32.23%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
10.45%

GDE

1D
-1.35%
1M
1.88%
YTD
9.79%
6M
11.87%
1Y
53.13%
3Y*
46.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEM vs. GDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
19.97%21.29%4.46%20.93%-9.09%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
9.79%73.76%44.79%33.85%-18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DEM and GDE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022

0.58

The correlation between DEM and GDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEM vs. GDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GDE
GDE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEM vs. GDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMGDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

2.36

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

7.34

+7.18

DEM vs. GDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the GDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEM and GDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMGDEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

1.88

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.15

-0.93

Drawdowns

DEM vs. GDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than GDE's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and GDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMGDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.85%

-32.01%

-19.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-22.66%

+14.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-22.66%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-11.17%

+9.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-7.88%

-5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

7.26%

-5.04%

Volatility

DEM vs. GDE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) is 5.64%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that DEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMGDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

6.65%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

24.24%

-12.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

28.39%

-14.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

26.12%

-10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

26.12%

-8.16%

DEM vs. GDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than GDE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEM vs. GDE - Dividend Comparison

DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than GDE's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
3.76%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
GDE
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund
3.94%4.32%7.14%2.22%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEM and GDE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDE has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to DEM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEM dropped -51.85% vs GDE's -32.01%.

On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 46.68% vs 19.32% for DEM. On fees, GDE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 46.68% return vs 19.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.

GDE has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 3.76% for DEM.

DEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GDE is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DEM and 0.20% for GDE.

DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEM and GDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer