PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEM.L vs. FLXE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) and Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DEM.L is traded in GBp, while FLXE.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEM.L achieves a 19.41% return, which is significantly higher than FLXE.L's 15.59% return.


DEM.L

1D
0.31%
1M
6.29%
YTD
19.41%
6M
19.10%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
12.42%

FLXE.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
2.79%
YTD
15.59%
6M
15.92%
1Y
33.57%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
7.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEM.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
19.41%12.71%11.70%18.04%-2.59%15.16%-6.66%17.84%-1.94%1.73%
FLXE.L
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
15.59%18.87%8.11%6.48%-9.68%8.46%-1.63%7.98%-6.24%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between DEM.L and FLXE.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.79

The correlation between DEM.L and FLXE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEM.L
FLXE.L

Financial Services

25.5%
21.1%

Technology

16.7%
11.9%

Industrials

11.7%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.9%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
9.5%

Basic Materials

6.5%
7.5%

Communication Services

5.5%
8.7%

Real Estate

5.0%
2.5%

Utilities

4.8%
3.3%

Energy

4.8%
11.7%

Healthcare

2.0%
2.5%

Financial Services

DEM.L
25.5%
FLXE.L
21.1%

Technology

DEM.L
16.7%
FLXE.L
11.9%

Industrials

DEM.L
11.7%
FLXE.L
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

DEM.L
8.9%
FLXE.L
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DEM.L
8.7%
FLXE.L
9.5%

Basic Materials

DEM.L
6.5%
FLXE.L
7.5%

Communication Services

DEM.L
5.5%
FLXE.L
8.7%

Real Estate

DEM.L
5.0%
FLXE.L
2.5%

Utilities

DEM.L
4.8%
FLXE.L
3.3%

Energy

DEM.L
4.8%
FLXE.L
11.7%

Healthcare

DEM.L
2.0%
FLXE.L
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEM.L
DEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXE.L
FLXE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FLXE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) and Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEM.LFLXE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

3.31

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.63

12.16

+4.47

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the FLXE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEM.L and FLXE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEM.LFLXE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.63

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

0.60

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.35

+0.25

Drawdowns

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEM.L drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than FLXE.L's maximum drawdown of -26.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM.L and FLXE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEM.LFLXE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.94%

-26.37%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-10.11%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

-10.93%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.48%

-16.31%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-1.82%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-5.98%

-0.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.75%

-0.85%

Volatility

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF (DEM.L) is 4.23%, while Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (FLXE.L) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that DEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEM.LFLXE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

4.62%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

10.77%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

12.71%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.31%

13.03%

+0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.47%

15.45%

+1.02%

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEM.L has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXE.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEM.L vs. FLXE.L - Dividend Comparison

DEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, while FLXE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM.L
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income UCITS ETF
3.72%4.47%11.82%9.48%7.05%4.14%9.14%6.10%4.19%3.16%1.48%4.55%
FLXE.L
Franklin Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEM.L and FLXE.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLXE.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLXE.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEM.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for DEM.L and 0.45% for FLXE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEM.L and FLXE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer