PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEI vs. CCOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DEI vs. CCOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) and Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEI achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly higher than CCOI's -37.25% return. Over the past 10 years, DEI has underperformed CCOI with an annualized return of -7.17%, while CCOI has yielded a comparatively higher -6.40% annualized return.


DEI

1D
-1.83%
1M
-5.52%
6M
16.12%
YTD
11.58%
1Y
-15.31%
3Y*
-1.06%
5Y*
-14.34%
10Y*
-7.17%
ALL TIME*
0.07%

CCOI

1D
1.96%
1M
3.93%
6M
-44.33%
YTD
-37.25%
1Y
-69.16%
3Y*
-36.17%
5Y*
-25.71%
10Y*
-6.40%
ALL TIME*
-5.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.71M$14.43M$20.93M
$20.45M$24.52M$29.23M

DEI vs. CCOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEI
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
11.58%-37.51%34.59%-1.87%-50.89%18.75%-30.86%31.96%-14.54%15.04%
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
-37.25%-70.14%7.19%41.23%-17.20%27.78%-5.33%51.98%4.25%14.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DEI and CCOI is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2006

0.34

The correlation between DEI and CCOI shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DEI:

$1.98B

CCOI:

$676.05M

EPS

DEI:

-$0.16

CCOI:

-$3.56

PS Ratio

DEI:

1.97

CCOI:

0.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

DEI:

$1.00B

CCOI:

$948.70M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DEI:

$277.78M

CCOI:

$307.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

DEI:

$544.46M

CCOI:

$187.51M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEI vs. CCOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEI
DEI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOI
CCOI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CCOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOI Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEI vs. CCOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) and Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEICCOIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.86

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

-0.92

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

-1.40

+0.80

DEI vs. CCOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEI Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is comparable to the CCOI Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEI and CCOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEI vs. CCOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEI drawdown since its inception was -76.53%, smaller than the maximum CCOI drawdown of -96.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEI and CCOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEICCOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.53%

-96.72%

+20.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.09%

-75.60%

+31.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.83%

-86.09%

+34.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.10%

-86.09%

+15.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.01%

-86.09%

+12.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.03%

-82.88%

+18.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.35%

-60.53%

+34.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.13%

49.65%

-21.52%

Volatility

DEI vs. CCOI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Douglas Emmett, Inc. (DEI) is 9.50%, while Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. (CCOI) has a volatility of 25.36%. This indicates that DEI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEICCOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.50%

25.36%

-15.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.57%

72.38%

-48.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.81%

90.08%

-59.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.56%

49.51%

-12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.83%

41.87%

-9.04%

Dividends

DEI vs. CCOI - Dividend Comparison

DEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, less than CCOI's 7.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCOI
Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.
7.96%14.15%5.09%4.94%6.23%4.33%4.64%3.71%4.69%3.97%3.65%4.21%
DEI
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
6.43%6.92%4.09%5.24%6.57%3.34%3.84%2.41%2.96%2.29%2.43%2.73%

Financials

DEI vs. CCOI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Douglas Emmett, Inc. and Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

DEI vs. CCOI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Douglas Emmett, Inc. and Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

DEI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 250.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CCOI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.96M and revenue of 239.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.0%.

DEI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 250.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CCOI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -13.51M and revenue of 239.19M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.7%.

DEI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Douglas Emmett, Inc. reported a net income of -2.50M and revenue of 250.96M, resulting in a net margin of -1.0%.

CCOI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cogent Communications Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -39.54M and revenue of 239.19M, resulting in a net margin of -16.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DEI and CCOI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCOI has higher volatility (25.36%) compared to DEI (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEI dropped -76.53% vs CCOI's -96.72%.

DEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEI and CCOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer