DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DEGC.DE (Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Global Equities funds. DEGC.DE is actively managed, while CSY9.DE is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEGC.DE charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSY9.DE.

Performance

DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DEGC.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEGC.DE achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.

DEGC.DE

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 3.23%
• YTD: 11.44%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSY9.DE

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 2.71%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 3.19%
• 1Y: 3.39%
• 3Y*: 6.65%
• 5Y*: 6.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEGC.DE Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	11.44%	2.00%
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD	3.19%	-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DEGC.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.59

Return for Risk

DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSY9.DE

CSY9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 15
CSY9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CSY9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CSY9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
CSY9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
CSY9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DEGC.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEGC.DE	CSY9.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.82	0.61	+2.21

Drawdowns

DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEGC.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum CSY9.DE drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEGC.DE and CSY9.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEGC.DE	CSY9.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.49%	-13.92%	+8.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.48%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.92%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.72%	+2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-3.70%	+2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DEGC.DE	CSY9.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.55%	8.07%	+1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.55%	12.03%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.55%	11.91%	-2.36%

DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEGC.DE has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DEGC.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DEGC.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEGC.DE and CSY9.DE in my portfolio?

DEGC.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DEGC.DE or CSY9.DE?

On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEGC.DE or CSY9.DE?

CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DEGC.DE.

What is the main difference between DEGC.DE and CSY9.DE?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DEGC.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.