DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE
DEGC.DE (Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and CBUH.DE (iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - DEGC.DE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while CBUH.DE is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI World Momentum ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select. DEGC.DE is actively managed, while CBUH.DE is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEGC.DE charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for CBUH.DE.
Performance
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEGC.DE achieves a 11.44% return, which is significantly lower than CBUH.DE's 22.41% return.
DEGC.DE
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 11.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBUH.DE
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 22.41%
- 6M
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DEGC.DE Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.44% | 2.00% |
CBUH.DE iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 22.41% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEGC.DE and CBUH.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DEGC.DE
CBUH.DE
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Core Equity UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DEGC.DE) and iShares MSCI World Momentum Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEGC.DE | CBUH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.82 | 0.64 | +2.18 |
Drawdowns
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEGC.DE drawdown since its inception was -5.49%, smaller than the maximum CBUH.DE drawdown of -22.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEGC.DE and CBUH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEGC.DE | CBUH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -22.61% | +17.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.51% | +0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -8.55% | +7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.27% | — |
Volatility
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEGC.DE | CBUH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.55% | 15.96% | -6.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 16.91% | -7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.55% | 16.91% | -7.36% |
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEGC.DE has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than CBUH.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEGC.DE vs. CBUH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DEGC.DE nor CBUH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DEGC.DE and CBUH.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEGC.DE is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEGC.DE is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CBUH.DE.
DEGC.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while CBUH.DE is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for DEGC.DE and 0.30% for CBUH.DE.
Find the right allocation for DEGC.DE and CBUH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer