DEFR vs. KDRN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DEFR (Aptus Deferred Income ETF) and KDRN (Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DEFR returned 4.53% vs 2.17% for KDRN. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DEFR charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for KDRN.

Performance

DEFR vs. KDRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEFR achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than KDRN's 0.36% return.

DEFR

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: -0.15%
• 6M: -0.30%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KDRN

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -0.43%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.08%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: 2.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEFR vs. KDRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF	-0.15%	6.80%
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF	0.36%	2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between DEFR and KDRN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.62

The correlation between DEFR and KDRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DEFR vs. KDRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEFR

DEFR Risk / Return Rank: 25
DEFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
DEFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
DEFR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
DEFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
DEFR Martin Ratio Rank: 25

KDRN

KDRN Risk / Return Rank: 21
KDRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
KDRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
KDRN Omega Ratio Rank: 19
KDRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
KDRN Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEFR vs. KDRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DEFR	KDRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	0.63	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	0.91	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.12	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	1.23	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.96	2.40	+0.55

DEFR vs. KDRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the KDRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEFR and KDRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DEFR vs. KDRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEFR drawdown since its inception was -3.90%, smaller than the maximum KDRN drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEFR and KDRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEFR	KDRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-15.29%	+11.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.90%	-1.77%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-1.66%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.02%	-4.71%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	0.90%	+0.64%

Volatility

DEFR vs. KDRN - Volatility Comparison

Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN) at 1.12%. This indicates that DEFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KDRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEFR	KDRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	1.12%	+0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.50%	2.15%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.17%	3.47%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.34%	6.58%	-1.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.34%	6.58%	-1.24%

DEFR vs. KDRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than KDRN's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEFR vs. KDRN - Dividend Comparison

DEFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KDRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DEFR Aptus Deferred Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF	3.14%	2.54%	2.83%	2.84%	2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEFR and KDRN in my portfolio?

DEFR and KDRN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEFR or KDRN?

DEFR has higher volatility (1.61%) compared to KDRN (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEFR dropped -3.90% vs KDRN's -15.29%.

Which ETF is better, DEFR or KDRN?

On 1-year performance, DEFR leads with 4.53% vs 2.17% for KDRN. On fees, DEFR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, KDRN has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEFR or KDRN?

Over the 1-year period, DEFR has performed better with a 4.53% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEFR or KDRN?

DEFR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for KDRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEFR or KDRN?

KDRN has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.00% for DEFR.

What is the main difference between DEFR and KDRN?

They also come from different issuers: Aptus and Kingsbarn. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DEFR and 1.09% for KDRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.