PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEFR vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEFR vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEFR achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 22.42% return.


DEFR

1D
0.41%
1M
0.83%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-0.30%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
-2.49%
1M
-15.10%
YTD
22.42%
6M
21.05%
1Y
27.68%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
6.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEFR vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DEFR and GSG is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

-0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEFR vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEFR
DEFR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
DEFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEFR Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DEFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEFR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEFR vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEFRGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.48

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

6.67

-3.71

DEFR vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEFR Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEFR and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEFR vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEFR drawdown since its inception was -3.90%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEFR and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEFRGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-89.62%

+85.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-18.81%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-63.04%

+60.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-63.69%

+62.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

4.16%

-2.62%

Volatility

DEFR vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aptus Deferred Income ETF (DEFR) is 1.61%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 5.75%. This indicates that DEFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEFRGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.61%

5.75%

-4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

20.98%

-17.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.17%

22.98%

-17.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.34%

22.70%

-17.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

22.02%

-16.68%

DEFR vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEFR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEFR vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

Neither DEFR nor GSG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DEFR and GSG have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to DEFR (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEFR dropped -3.90% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 27.68% vs 4.53% for DEFR. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DEFR has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 27.68% return vs 4.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DEFR.

DEFR and GSG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DEFR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Aptus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DEFR and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEFR and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer