PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECZ vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECZ vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECZ achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


DECZ

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.15%
YTD
8.14%
6M
8.12%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECZ vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
8.14%12.34%18.89%18.32%-8.93%20.15%1.64%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%8.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DECZ and OILK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020

0.11

The correlation between DECZ and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DECZ vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DECZ
OILK

Technology

35.3%

-

Financial Services

13.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
100.0%

Communication Services

9.9%

-

Healthcare

8.8%

-

Industrials

7.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.2%

-

Energy

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Technology

DECZ
35.3%
OILK

-

Financial Services

DECZ
13.4%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

DECZ
10.6%
OILK
100.0%

Communication Services

DECZ
9.9%
OILK

-

Healthcare

DECZ
8.8%
OILK

-

Industrials

DECZ
7.8%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

DECZ
5.2%
OILK

-

Energy

DECZ
3.0%
OILK

-

Utilities

DECZ
2.5%
OILK

-

Real Estate

DECZ
2.0%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

DECZ
1.6%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECZ vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECZ
DECZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DECZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DECZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECZ vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DECZOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

3.42

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

6.91

+4.44

DECZ vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECZ and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DECZOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.06

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.59

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.12

+0.89

Drawdowns

DECZ vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECZ drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECZ and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECZOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-83.76%

+67.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-17.35%

+9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-23.42%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

-34.69%

+18.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-3.66%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-32.61%

+29.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

8.56%

-6.78%

Volatility

DECZ vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) is 2.47%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that DECZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECZOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

10.44%

-7.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

23.26%

-16.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

28.75%

-19.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.59%

30.12%

-17.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.39%

35.97%

-23.58%

DECZ vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

DECZ vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DECZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF
3.03%3.28%2.55%1.23%1.44%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DECZ and OILK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to DECZ (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECZ dropped -16.57% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 11.21% for DECZ. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, DECZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DECZ.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 3.03% for DECZ.

DECZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while OILK is Oil & Gas. DECZ tracks S&P 500, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DECZ and 0.68% for OILK.

DECZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECZ and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer