DECZ vs. NOVZ
DECZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF) and NOVZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DECZ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500, while NOVZ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares. DECZ is passively managed, while NOVZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DECZ returned 11.21%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for NOVZ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DECZ having a 8.14% return and NOVZ slightly lower at 8.13%.
DECZ
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 8.14%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 20.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- —
NOVZ
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- 8.13%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 20.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | 8.14% | 12.34% | 18.89% | 18.32% | -8.93% | 20.15% | 1.64% |
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF | 8.13% | 13.03% | 19.09% | 18.06% | -9.58% | 21.46% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECZ and NOVZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between DECZ and NOVZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DECZ
NOVZ
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
DECZ
NOVZ
Financial Services
DECZ
NOVZ
Consumer Cyclical
DECZ
NOVZ
Communication Services
DECZ
NOVZ
Healthcare
DECZ
NOVZ
Industrials
DECZ
NOVZ
Consumer Defensive
DECZ
NOVZ
Energy
DECZ
NOVZ
Utilities
DECZ
NOVZ
Real Estate
DECZ
NOVZ
Basic Materials
DECZ
NOVZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECZ vs. NOVZ — Risk / Return Rank
DECZ
NOVZ
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) and TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DECZ | NOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.08 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.35 | 13.64 | -2.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DECZ | NOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.21 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.89 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.11 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECZ drawdown since its inception was -16.57%, roughly equal to the maximum NOVZ drawdown of -16.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECZ and NOVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECZ | NOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.57% | -16.62% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -6.72% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.24% | -14.63% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.57% | -16.62% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.59% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.06% | -3.06% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.51% | +0.27% |
Volatility
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF (DECZ) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) at 2.35%. This indicates that DECZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECZ | NOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 2.35% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 6.97% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.57% | 9.39% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 12.87% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.39% | 12.71% | -0.32% |
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DECZ and NOVZ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
DECZ vs. NOVZ - Dividend Comparison
DECZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than NOVZ's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (December) ETF | 3.03% | 3.28% | 2.55% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 0.46% |
NOVZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF | 3.32% | 3.58% | 2.94% | 2.27% | 0.25% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DECZ and NOVZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DECZ has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to NOVZ (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECZ dropped -16.57% vs NOVZ's -16.62%.
On 5-year performance, NOVZ leads with 11.35% vs 11.21% for DECZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, NOVZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NOVZ has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 11.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DECZ and NOVZ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
NOVZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 3.03% for DECZ.
DECZ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NOVZ is Options Trading.
NOVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DECZ and NOVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer