DECK vs. PCFT.L
DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) and PCFT.L (Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc) are both stocks. DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while PCFT.L operates in Collective Investments (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, DECK returned 28.83%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for PCFT.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DECK vs. PCFT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DECK is traded in USD, while PCFT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PCFT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECK achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than PCFT.L's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, DECK has outperformed PCFT.L with an annualized return of 28.83%, while PCFT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.37% annualized return.
DECK
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 21.67%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 28.83%
PCFT.L
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 4.40%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 17.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.37%
DECK vs. PCFT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 9.80% | -48.95% | 82.30% | 67.46% | 8.97% | 27.73% | 69.83% | 31.97% | 59.44% | 44.88% |
PCFT.L Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc | 1.73% | 34.09% | 29.57% | 6.13% | -18.94% | 24.25% | 3.94% | 27.95% | -17.93% | 27.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECK and PCFT.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
DECK:
$16.11B
PCFT.L:
£561.73M
DECK:
$6.98
PCFT.L:
£0.90
DECK:
16.31
PCFT.L:
2.56
DECK:
0.59
PCFT.L:
0.00
DECK:
3.05
PCFT.L:
3.04
DECK:
6.44
PCFT.L:
1.49
DECK:
$5.47B
PCFT.L:
£184.77M
DECK:
$3.16B
PCFT.L:
£181.04M
DECK:
$1.31B
PCFT.L:
£232.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECK vs. PCFT.L — Risk / Return Rank
DECK
PCFT.L
DECK vs. PCFT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DECK | PCFT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.16 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.98 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 2.82 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DECK vs. PCFT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECK drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than PCFT.L's maximum drawdown of -47.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECK and PCFT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECK | PCFT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -47.20% | -47.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.81% | -14.63% | -21.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.35% | -14.63% | -49.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.35% | -39.96% | -24.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.35% | -47.20% | -17.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.98% | -3.15% | -45.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -11.57% | -28.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.87% | 5.11% | +11.76% |
Volatility
DECK vs. PCFT.L - Volatility Comparison
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L) at 3.16%. This indicates that DECK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCFT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECK | PCFT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.35% | 3.16% | +7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | 13.51% | +17.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.42% | 17.13% | +28.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.98% | 19.93% | +24.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 22.47% | +20.00% |
Dividends
DECK vs. PCFT.L - Dividend Comparison
DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCFT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCFT.L Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc | 3.93% | 2.76% | 2.40% | 3.01% | 2.88% | 2.54% | 3.10% | 2.95% | 3.31% | 2.55% | 2.71% | 3.90% |
Financials
DECK vs. PCFT.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DECK and PCFT.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DECK and PCFT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer