PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECK vs. FNX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DECK vs. FNX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DECK is traded in USD, while FNX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FNX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECK achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than FNX.L's -8.36% return.


DECK

1D
-0.47%
1M
21.67%
YTD
9.80%
6M
12.50%
1Y
12.17%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
28.83%

FNX.L

1D
3.23%
1M
-2.95%
YTD
-8.36%
6M
-15.51%
1Y
-26.49%
3Y*
-2.67%
5Y*
2.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECK vs. FNX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
9.80%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%14.16%
FNX.L
Fonix Mobile plc
-8.36%-11.75%-11.16%25.54%21.09%21.89%62.61%

Correlation

The correlation between DECK and FNX.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2020

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DECK:

$16.11B

FNX.L:

£151.58M

EPS

DECK:

$6.98

FNX.L:

£0.22

PE Ratio

DECK:

16.31

FNX.L:

6.81

PEG Ratio

DECK:

0.59

FNX.L:

0.41

PS Ratio

DECK:

3.05

FNX.L:

1.00

PB Ratio

DECK:

6.44

FNX.L:

13.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

DECK:

$5.47B

FNX.L:

£151.55M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DECK:

$3.16B

FNX.L:

£35.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

DECK:

$1.31B

FNX.L:

£30.49M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECK vs. FNX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FNX.L
FNX.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
FNX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECK vs. FNX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECKFNX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.89

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.16

-0.75

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

-1.30

+1.64

DECK vs. FNX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECK Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the FNX.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECK and FNX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECK vs. FNX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECK drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, which is greater than FNX.L's maximum drawdown of -40.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECK and FNX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECKFNX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.36%

-40.38%

-53.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.81%

-35.64%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.35%

-40.38%

-23.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.35%

-40.38%

-23.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.98%

-36.45%

-12.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.35%

-14.99%

-25.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.87%

20.55%

-3.68%

Volatility

DECK vs. FNX.L - Volatility Comparison

Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Fonix Mobile plc (FNX.L) at 9.73%. This indicates that DECK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECKFNX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

9.73%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.08%

31.03%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.42%

37.16%

+8.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.98%

38.14%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.47%

38.87%

+3.60%

Dividends

DECK vs. FNX.L - Dividend Comparison

DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FNX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FNX.L
Fonix Mobile plc
5.92%7.00%3.81%2.90%2.99%3.14%

Financials

DECK vs. FNX.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Fonix Mobile plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.12B
42.33M
(DECK) Total Revenue
(FNX.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. DECK values in USD, FNX.L values in GBP

DECK vs. FNX.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Fonix Mobile plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
57.6%
23.5%
Portfolio components
DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

FNX.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fonix Mobile plc reported a gross profit of 9.94M and revenue of 42.33M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.5%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

FNX.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fonix Mobile plc reported an operating income of 7.63M and revenue of 42.33M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.0%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.

FNX.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fonix Mobile plc reported a net income of 6.11M and revenue of 42.33M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DECK and FNX.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECK and FNX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer