DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L
DEAM.DE (Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A) and CC1U.L (Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD) are both exchange-traded funds - DEAM.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MDAX®, while CC1U.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEAM.DE returned -1.92%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CC1U.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DEAM.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CC1U.L.
Performance
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DEAM.DE is traded in EUR, while CC1U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CC1U.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEAM.DE achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly higher than CC1U.L's -1.76% return.
DEAM.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 3.95%
- 6M
- 5.04%
- 1Y
- 6.32%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- -1.92%
- 10Y*
- —
CC1U.L
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -4.62%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- —
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEAM.DE Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A | 3.95% | 19.33% | -6.04% | 7.34% | -28.80% | 13.67% | 8.06% | 20.37% |
CC1U.L Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD | -1.76% | 22.93% | 8.24% | -13.99% | -3.70% | 4.15% | -9.94% | 4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEAM.DE and CC1U.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2019 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L — Risk / Return Rank
DEAM.DE
CC1U.L
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A (DEAM.DE) and Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEAM.DE | CC1U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.45 | -1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.19 | 2.93 | -1.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEAM.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.04%, roughly equal to the maximum CC1U.L drawdown of -40.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEAM.DE and CC1U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEAM.DE | CC1U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.04% | -40.70% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -15.72% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.48% | -38.24% | +19.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.04% | -40.50% | +0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.72% | -12.29% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -13.41% | -2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 7.78% | -2.47% |
Volatility
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MDAX UCITS ETF A (DEAM.DE) is 5.05%, while Amundi MSCI China UCITS ETF-C USD (CC1U.L) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that DEAM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CC1U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEAM.DE | CC1U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 7.20% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 15.81% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.59% | 23.16% | -4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 26.35% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 24.92% | -5.34% |
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEAM.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CC1U.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEAM.DE vs. CC1U.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither DEAM.DE nor CC1U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DEAM.DE and CC1U.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DEAM.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DEAM.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CC1U.L.
DEAM.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while CC1U.L is China Equities. DEAM.DE tracks MDAX®, while CC1U.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DEAM.DE and 0.45% for CC1U.L.
Find the right allocation for DEAM.DE and CC1U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer