PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSECX vs. OANMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSECX vs. OANMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) and Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSECX achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly higher than OANMX's -0.83% return.


PSECX

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
3.23%
6M
2.17%
1Y
8.22%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.28%

OANMX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
2.21%
1Y
11.71%
3Y*
15.29%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSECX vs. OANMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
3.23%8.04%14.49%10.64%-10.66%25.43%0.78%23.99%-5.18%4.40%
OANMX
Oakmark Fund Institutional Class
-0.83%14.38%16.28%31.21%-13.18%34.87%13.09%27.35%-12.62%15.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PSECX and OANMX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.78

The correlation between PSECX and OANMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSECX vs. OANMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSECX
PSECX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PSECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSECX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PSECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSECX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

OANMX
OANMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
OANMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OANMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
OANMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OANMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
OANMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSECX vs. OANMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) and Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSECXOANMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.81

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.26

4.67

-0.40

PSECX vs. OANMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSECX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the OANMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSECX and OANMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSECXOANMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.97

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.53

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.59

-0.03

Drawdowns

PSECX vs. OANMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSECX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum OANMX drawdown of -40.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSECX and OANMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSECXOANMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.13%

-40.08%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.44%

-6.93%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.51%

-17.01%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-23.55%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-3.38%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-5.58%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.69%

-0.69%

Volatility

PSECX vs. OANMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) is 2.71%, while Oakmark Fund Institutional Class (OANMX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that PSECX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OANMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSECXOANMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.93%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.71%

9.34%

-1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

13.01%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.94%

18.29%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.20%

20.64%

-7.44%

PSECX vs. OANMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSECX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than OANMX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSECX vs. OANMX - Dividend Comparison

PSECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than OANMX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OANMX
Oakmark Fund Institutional Class
1.15%1.14%1.34%1.22%1.17%1.94%0.33%8.53%8.37%0.66%0.00%0.00%
PSECX
1789 Growth and Income Fund
0.98%0.85%3.88%2.71%4.60%1.53%0.27%1.16%6.78%0.59%0.31%5.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSECX and OANMX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OANMX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PSECX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSECX dropped -31.13% vs OANMX's -40.08%.

OANMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSECX and OANMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer