PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDV vs. IBTO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDV vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than IBTO's -0.35% return.


DDV

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.35%
6M
2.50%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBTO

1D
0.29%
1M
0.66%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.43%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDV vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
2.35%0.47%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-0.35%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between DDV and IBTO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDV vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDV vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDVIBTODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.66

DDV vs. IBTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDV vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum IBTO drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and IBTO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDVIBTODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-8.36%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-2.41%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-2.37%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.37%

Volatility

DDV vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDVIBTODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

4.38%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.67%

6.59%

-3.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.67%

6.59%

-3.92%

DDV vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DDV vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison

DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than IBTO's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.21%0.42%0.00%0.00%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
4.14%4.05%4.23%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDV and IBTO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.

IBTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 0.07% for IBTO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDV and IBTO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer