PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDV vs. DFCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDV vs. DFCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly higher than DFCF's 0.37% return.


DDV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.23%
6M
2.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFCF

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.78%
3Y*
4.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDV vs. DFCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
2.23%0.71%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
0.37%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DDV and DFCF is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDV vs. DFCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDV

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDV vs. DFCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDV vs. DFCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDVDFCFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.06

0.04

+2.02

Drawdowns

DDV vs. DFCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum DFCF drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and DFCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDVDFCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-19.56%

+17.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.46%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-8.04%

+7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

Volatility

DDV vs. DFCF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDVDFCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68%

3.99%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.68%

6.46%

-3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.68%

6.46%

-3.78%

DDV vs. DFCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DFCF's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DDV vs. DFCF - Dividend Comparison

DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than DFCF's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DDV
Defined Duration 5 ETF
1.21%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.31%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDV and DFCF have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFCF is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFCF is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.

DFCF has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 0.17% for DFCF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDV and DFCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer