DDV vs. BBAG
DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) and BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. DDV is actively managed, while BBAG is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BBAG.
Performance
DDV vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDV achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than BBAG's 0.46% return.
DDV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 2.12%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBAG
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- —
DDV vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.12% | 0.47% |
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.46% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDV and BBAG is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDV vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBAG
DDV vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDV | BBAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDV vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDV drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDV and BBAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDV | BBAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -18.73% | +16.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -2.56% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -6.20% | +5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.99% | — |
Volatility
DDV vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDV | BBAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69% | 3.89% | -1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 5.93% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.69% | 5.79% | -3.10% |
DDV vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DDV vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison
DDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than BBAG's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.35% | 4.29% | 4.25% | 3.60% | 2.23% | 1.44% | 2.26% | 2.92% | 0.16% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDV and BBAG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
They also come from different issuers: Discipline Funds and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DDV and 0.03% for BBAG.
Find the right allocation for DDV and BBAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer