DDTS vs. USO
DDTS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DDTS is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. DDTS is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. DDTS charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
DDTS vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDTS achieves a 6.05% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 70.32% return.
DDTS
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 8.36%
- 1M
- -6.09%
- 6M
- 64.40%
- YTD
- 70.32%
- 1Y
- 52.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 18.84%
- 10Y*
- 2.97%
DDTS vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF | 6.05% | 4.57% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 70.32% | -7.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTS and USO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTS vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
DDTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USO
DDTS vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTS | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTS vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTS | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -98.19% | +93.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -32.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -87.47% | +87.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -75.35% | +74.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.04% | — |
Volatility
DDTS vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTS | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.46% | 44.98% | -38.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 36.69% | -30.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.46% | 39.07% | -32.61% |
DDTS vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDTS has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDTS vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTS nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTS and USO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDTS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
DDTS and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDTS is categorized as Defined Outcome, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTS and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for DDTS and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer