DDTS vs. PJUL
DDTS (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF) and PJUL (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDTS is actively managed, while PJUL is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
DDTS vs. PJUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DDTS having a 4.97% return and PJUL slightly lower at 4.80%.
DDTS
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PJUL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 14.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.24%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- —
DDTS vs. PJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF | 4.97% | 4.57% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 4.80% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDTS and PJUL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDTS vs. PJUL — Risk / Return Rank
DDTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PJUL
DDTS vs. PJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF (DDTS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July (PJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDTS | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.61 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDTS vs. PJUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDTS drawdown since its inception was -4.28%, smaller than the maximum PJUL drawdown of -18.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTS and PJUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDTS | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.28% | -18.17% | +13.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -10.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.14% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -1.46% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility
DDTS vs. PJUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDTS | PJUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 5.22% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 8.61% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 10.00% | -3.36% |
DDTS vs. PJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DDTS and PJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
DDTS vs. PJUL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDTS nor PJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDTS Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PJUL Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDTS and PJUL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDTS and PJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
DDTS and PJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for DDTS and PJUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer