DDTO vs. EAPR

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DDTO (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October) and EAPR (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. DDTO is actively managed, while EAPR is passively managed. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DDTO charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for EAPR.

Performance

DDTO vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October (DDTO) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDTO achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 9.17% return.

DDTO

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 0.92%
• 6M: 5.98%
• YTD: 6.80%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EAPR

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 8.21%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 1Y: 15.75%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DDTO Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October	$79.99K	$109.02K	$145.87K
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	$354.30K	$262.28K	$462.78K

DDTO vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DDTO Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October	6.80%	2.21%
EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April	9.17%	1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between DDTO and EAPR is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.61

Return for Risk

DDTO vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDTO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EAPR

EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 79
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDTO vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - October (DDTO) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DDTO	EAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.59	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.34	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.34	—

Drawdowns

DDTO vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDTO drawdown since its inception was -4.98%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDTO and EAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DDTO	EAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-17.65%	+12.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.78%	+2.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-4.02%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DDTO	EAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.11%	9.63%	-2.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.11%	10.41%	-3.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.11%	10.30%	-3.19%

DDTO vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDTO has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

DDTO vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDTO nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DDTO and EAPR in my portfolio?

DDTO and EAPR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DDTO or EAPR?

On fees, DDTO is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DDTO or EAPR?

DDTO is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DDTO or EAPR?

DDTO and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DDTO and EAPR?

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDTO and 0.89% for EAPR.